LEVELJEE Main
Visualized Solution
The Sigma Insight: Electrochemical Cells
The Golden Rule of Electrode Potentials
Why We Can't Just Add Them Up
Imagine you are trying to find the temperature of a mixture of two cups of water. If one cup is at and the other is at , you wouldn't just add them to say the mixture is , right? Temperature is an intensive property; it doesn't depend on the amount of substance.
Similarly, in electrochemistry, the standard electrode potential () is an intensive property. A very common trap students fall into is directly adding or subtracting values when combining half-reactions.
In our problem, we are given:
We need to find the potential for the intermediate step:
The Hero
Gibbs Free Energy
To navigate around this trap, we must use an extensive property—one that scales with the amount of substance and can be algebraically added or subtracted. Enter standard Gibbs free energy change ().
The magic bridge connecting the intensive to the extensive is the equation:
Here, is the number of electrons transferred, and is the Faraday constant.
The Execution
Let's convert our known potentials into Gibbs free energy.
For the first reaction (), three electrons are involved ():
For the second reaction (), two electrons are involved ():
Now, how do we construct our target reaction? If we take the first equation and subtract the second equation from it, the solid cancels out perfectly, leaving us with .
Since we subtracted the equations, we must subtract their Gibbs free energies:
The Final Calculation
We have the Gibbs free energy for our target reaction. Now, we just convert it back to an electrode potential. For the target reaction, only one electron is transferred ().
The Faraday constant and the negative signs cancel out beautifully, leaving us with:
This sequence of reactions is a classic example of a Latimer Diagram. Always remember the golden rule: never add potentials directly. Convert to , do the math, and convert back!
Similar Questions
LEVELJEE Advanced
Given, , . The potential for the cell is
(A)
0.26 V
(B)
0.399 V
(C)
- 0.339 V
(D)
- 0.26 V
LEVELJEE Main
Consider the following values :\n\n\nUnder standard conditions, the potential for the reaction\n is
(A)
1.68 V
(B)
1.40 V
(C)
0.91 V
(D)
0.63 V
JEE Main 2020
LEVELJEE Main
Given that the standard potentials () of and are and respectively, the of is
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
LEVELJEE Main
The standard reduction potentials for , and are , and , respectively. The reaction will be spontaneous when
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
LEVELJEE Main
For a cell reaction involving a two electron change, the standard emf of the cell is found to be at . The equilibrium constant of the reaction at will be
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
JEE Main 2019
LEVELJEE Main
For the cell, , different half cells and their standard electrode potentials are given below. \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline & Au^{3+}(aq)/Au(s) & Ag^{+}(aq)/Ag(s) & Fe^{3+}(aq)/Fe^{2+}(aq) & Fe^{2+}(aq)/Fe(s) \\ \hline E^{\circ}_{M^{x+}/M}/V & 1.40 & 0.80 & 0.77 & -0.44 \\ \hline \end{array} If , which cathode will give a maximum value of per electron transferred?
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
LEVELJEE Main
The standard emf of a cell, involving one electron change is found to be at . The equilibrium constant of the reaction is ()
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
JEE Main 2021
LEVELJEE Advanced
For the reaction, The magnitude of the standard molar Gibbs free energy change, kJ (Round off to the nearest integer).
JEE Advanced 2021
LEVELJEE Advanced
Some standard electrode potentials at 298 K are given below: To a solution containing of and of , the metal rods X and Y are inserted (at 298 K) and connected by a conducting wire. This resulted in dissolution of X. The correct combination(s) of X and Y, respectively, is (are) (Given: Gas constant, , Faraday constant, )
* Multiple Correct Options
(A)
Cd and Ni
(B)
Cd and Fe
(C)
Ni and Pb
(D)
Ni and Fe
JEE Main 2019
LEVELJEE Main
If the standard electrode potential for a cell is at , the equilibrium constant () for the reaction, at is approximately (, )
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
