Imagine a particle trapped in a tube, bouncing back and forth between a fixed wall and a slowly moving piston. This is a classic setup that beautifully marries kinematics, collisions, and calculus. Let's break it down step by step.
Analyzing the Setup
The particle travels a distance L to the closed end and L back to the piston. The total distance between two successive collisions with the piston is 2L. Since the particle moves with speed v, the time taken for this round trip is Δt=v2L.
The rate of collision, or frequency, is simply the reciprocal of this time period.
This immediately tells us that Option A is incorrect, as it suggests the rate is v/L.
The Elastic Collision
When the particle strikes the heavy piston, we must consider relative velocities. The piston moves inward with a very small speed V, and the particle approaches it with speed v.
The relative velocity of approach is v+V.
Because the collision is perfectly elastic and the piston is massive, the relative velocity of separation must equal the relative velocity of approach.
If v′ is the particle's new speed after bouncing off, its velocity of separation from the piston is v′−V.
The particle's speed increases by exactly 2V after each collision! This makes Option B correct.
The Master Equation
Now, let's look at the macroscopic change over a small time interval dt. How many collisions occur in this time?
Since each collision increases the speed by 2V, the total change in speed dv is:
dv=dn×2V=(2Lvdt)(2V)=LvVdt
We know the piston is moving inward, so the length L is decreasing. The infinitesimal change in length dL is related to the piston's speed by dL=−Vdt.
Substituting Vdt=−dL into our equation:
This shows that Option D is incorrect, as it misses the negative sign and has an extra factor of 2.
Final Calculation
To find the relationship between speed and length, we integrate our differential equation.
Integrating from the initial state (v0,L0) to the final state (v,L):
ln(v0v)=−ln(L0L)=ln(LL0)
This elegant result tells us that the product vL is constant!
The problem asks about the kinetic energy when the length is halved to L=2L0.
Using our relation, the new speed is:
The speed doubles! Since kinetic energy K=21mv2, doubling the speed increases the kinetic energy by a factor of 22=4.
Kfinal=21m(2v0)2=4(21mv02)=4K0
Option C is absolutely correct.