Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are observing a classic physics experiment. A small particle of mass m is zooming along a straight line with a velocity v.
Ahead of it lies a larger, stationary particle of mass M. They are on a collision course.
Our objective is to determine the exact conditions under which this collision results in the maximum possible loss of kinetic energy, and to calculate what that maximum loss is.
The Master Equation
To solve this, we need to pull out our master equation for the loss of kinetic energy in a one-dimensional collision.
The energy loss, denoted by ΔK, is given by the formula:
Here, the term m+MmM is known as the reduced mass of the system.
The term vrel is the relative velocity of approach, which in our case is simply v, since the second mass is at rest.
Finally, e is the coefficient of restitution, a number between 0 and 1 that tells us how "bouncy" the collision is.
The Condition for Maximum Loss
Now, let's look closely at the equation. We want to maximize ΔK.
The masses and the initial velocity are fixed. The only variable that depends on the nature of the collision is e.
To make ΔK as large as possible, the term (1−e2) must be maximized.
Since e ranges from 0 to 1, the maximum value of (1−e2) is exactly 1, which occurs when e=0.
What does e=0 mean physically? It means the collision is perfectly inelastic. The two particles do not bounce off each other at all; instead, they stick together and move as a single combined mass.
This perfectly aligns with Statement II, which claims that maximum energy loss occurs when the particles get stuck together. Therefore, Statement II is absolutely true!
Final Calculation
Now that we know e=0 gives the maximum energy loss, let's substitute it back into our master equation to find the exact value.
The problem asks us to express this loss as a fraction f of the initial kinetic energy of the moving particle, which is 21mv2. Let's rearrange our result to match this format:
By comparing this with the expression given in the problem, ΔKmax=f(21mv2), we can clearly see that the fraction f is:
The Verdict
Let's evaluate Statement I. It claims that the fraction f is equal to M+mm.
However, our rigorous derivation shows that the numerator must be M (the mass of the stationary particle), not m.
Therefore, Statement I is definitively false.
With Statement I being false and Statement II being true, the correct choice is option (d).