Decoding Absorption Spectra in Coordination Complexes
Have you ever wondered why coordination complexes exhibit such brilliant and diverse colors? The secret lies in the intricate dance between light, energy, and the nature of the ligands surrounding the central metal ion. In this problem, we are presented with the absorption spectra of three different complexes and tasked with matching them to their respective ligands. Let's embark on this fascinating journey through Crystal Field Theory.
Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are looking at the provided absorption graph. We see three distinct peaks labeled A, B, and C. The x-axis represents the wavelength (λ) of the absorbed light. By simply observing the positions of these peaks, we can establish a clear relationship:
This tells us that complex A absorbs light of the shortest wavelength, while complex C absorbs light of the longest wavelength.
The Master Equation
To connect this visual data to the chemical properties of the complexes, we must invoke Planck's famous equation, which relates the energy of a photon to its wavelength:
In the context of coordination compounds, this energy difference (ΔE) corresponds to the Crystal Field Splitting Energy (Δ0). Because energy and wavelength are inversely proportional, the order of splitting energies is the exact opposite of the wavelength order:
This is a crucial realization! It means that the complex responsible for peak A experiences the greatest splitting of its d-orbitals.
The Spectrochemical Series
Now, what causes this splitting? It's the ligands! According to Crystal Field Theory, the magnitude of Δ0 is directly proportional to the strength of the ligand field. Stronger ligands cause a larger energy gap between the t2g and eg orbitals.
We are given three ligands to evaluate: NCS−, F−, and NH3. To rank them, we rely on the spectrochemical series, a vital tool for any chemistry student. The series dictates the following order of ligand strength:
Final Calculation
With all the pieces of the puzzle in hand, we can now make the final connections.
Ammonia (NH3) is the strongest ligand among the three. Therefore, it will produce the largest splitting energy (Δ0), which corresponds to the absorption of the highest energy and shortest wavelength light. This perfectly matches Peak A.
Conversely, the fluoride ion (F−) is the weakest ligand. It will cause the smallest splitting, absorbing the lowest energy and longest wavelength light. This corresponds to Peak C.
By elimination, the thiocyanate ion (NCS−), which has intermediate strength, corresponds to Peak B.
Summarizing our findings:
- A → (iii) [M(NH3)6]n+
- B → (i) [M(NCS)6](−6+n)
- C → (ii) [MF6](−6+n)
This elegant interplay of physics and chemistry leads us directly to the correct option, (a).