The problem presents us with a fascinating implicit relationship between time t and position x: t=mx2+nx. Our ultimate goal is to find the retardation of the particle, which is simply the negative of its acceleration.
To embark on this journey, we must remember the fundamental definitions of kinematics. Velocity v is the rate of change of position with respect to time, mathematically expressed as v=dtdx. Acceleration a, in turn, is the rate of change of velocity, given by a=dtdv.
Analyzing the Setup
Instead of trying to solve the quadratic equation for x in terms of t—which would involve messy square roots—we can use the power of implicit differentiation. By differentiating both sides of our equation with respect to time t, we can elegantly extract the velocity term.
Let's differentiate t=mx2+nx with respect to t. The derivative of t is simply 1. On the right side, we apply the chain rule. The derivative of mx2 is 2mx⋅dtdx, and the derivative of nx is n⋅dtdx.
The Master Equation
Finding Velocity
Putting it all together, we get:
1=2mxdtdx+ndtdx
Now, we recognize that
dtdx is exactly our velocity
v. Substituting
v into the equation and factoring it out yields:
1=v(2mx+n)
Isolating
v, we arrive at a beautiful expression for velocity in terms of position:
v=(2mx+n)−1
This is our master equation. It tells us exactly how fast the particle is moving at any given position x.
Final Calculation
Deriving Retardation
To find the acceleration, we must differentiate our velocity expression with respect to time
t.
a=dtdv=dtd[(2mx+n)−1]
Applying the power rule, the
−1 exponent comes down, and the new exponent becomes
−2. But we must not forget the chain rule! We multiply by the derivative of the inner function
(2mx+n) with respect to
t.
a=−1(2mx+n)−2⋅dtd(2mx+n)
The derivative of the inner function is
2mdtdx, which is simply
2mv. Substituting this back, we get:
a=−(2mx+n)−2⋅2mv
Now, look closely at the term (2mx+n)−2. From our master equation, we know that v=(2mx+n)−1. Therefore, squaring both sides gives v2=(2mx+n)−2.
Substituting
v2 into our acceleration equation, the magic happens:
a=−v2⋅2mv=−2mv3
The question asks for
retardation, which is the magnitude of negative acceleration. Thus, we drop the minus sign.
Retardation=2mv3
The Alternative Path
For those who love kinematic shortcuts, there is another way! We know that acceleration can also be written as a=vdxdv.
Starting from
v=(2mx+n)−1, we can differentiate directly with respect to
x:
dxdv=−1(2mx+n)−2⋅2m=−2mv2
Multiplying this by
v gives the acceleration:
a=v(−2mv2)=−2mv3
Both paths lead to the same elegant destination. The beauty of calculus lies in its consistency!