The journey of mastering optics often brings us to problems that beautifully intertwine multiple concepts. This problem from JEE Advanced 2016 is a perfect example, blending refraction through a lens with reflection from a curved surface. Let's dive into the fascinating physics behind it!
Analyzing the Setup
Imagine a plano-convex lens with its curved surface facing an object placed 30 cm away
The problem states that the image produced is double the size of the object. This gives us a crucial clue about the magnification.
Since the options suggest a focal length of 20 cm, and the object is at 30 cm (which is between f and 2f), the image must be real and inverted. If we assumed a virtual image, the math would lead us to a refractive index not present in the options.
The Refraction Phase
For a real, inverted image that is double the size, the magnification m is −2
Using the magnification formula for lenses:
m=uv
−2=−30v
v=+60 cm
Now that we have the image distance, we can deploy the thin lens formula to find the focal length
f:
v1−u1=f1
601−−301=f1
601+602=f1
603=f1⟹f=+20 cm
This immediately confirms that option (d) is correct!
The Reflection Twist
Here is where the problem gets incredibly interesting
The curved front surface of the lens doesn't just refract light; it also reflects a small portion of it, acting exactly like a convex mirror!
This reflection forms a faint virtual image
10 cm behind the mirror. For this convex mirror, the object distance
u is
−30 cm, and the image distance
v is
+10 cm. Let's use the mirror formula to find its focal length
fm:
v1+u1=fm1
101+−301=fm1
303−301=fm1
fm=+15 cm
Since the radius of curvature
R is twice the focal length for a mirror, we have:
R=2fm=30 cm
This tells us that option (b) is incorrect. Also, since convex mirrors always form virtual and erect images for real objects, the faint image is virtual, making option (c) incorrect.
The Master Equation
Finally, we need to find the refractive index n of the lens material
We have the focal length of the lens (f=20 cm) and the radius of curvature of its first surface (R1=+30 cm). Since it's a plano-convex lens, the second surface is flat, meaning R2=∞.
We bring in the powerful Lens Maker's Formula:
f1=(n−1)(R11−R21)
201=(n−1)(301−∞1)
201=(n−1)(301−0)
n−1=2030=1.5
n=2.5
And there we have it! The refractive index of the lens is 2.5, confirming that option (a) is also correct.
Final Answer: The correct statements are (a) and (d). This problem is a brilliant reminder to always look for the hidden phenomena—like reflection at a refracting surface—that make physics so deeply interconnected and beautiful.