Animated Solution for Mathematics - Limits, Continuity and Differentiability: limn→∞2n4+4n+3−n4+5n+41+2−3+4+5−6+...+(3n−2)+(3n−1)−3n is :
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Analyzing the Problem Structure
The given limit has a complex series in the numerator and radical expressions in the denominator.
We need to evaluate limn→∞DenominatorNumerator.
Let's break this down by analyzing the numerator and denominator separately.
Grouping the Numerator Terms
The numerator is: 1+2−3+4+5−6+...+(3n−2)+(3n−1)−3n.
Observe the pattern: every third term is negative.
We can group these terms into triplets to simplify the series.
Let's define the k-th group as Gk=(3k−2)+(3k−1)−3k.
Evaluating Individual Groups
Let's calculate the sum of each triplet group.
Group 1: 1+2−3=0
Group 2: 4+5−6=3
Group n: (3n−2)+(3n−1)−3n=3n−3=3(n−1)
Summing the Arithmetic Progression
The simplified numerator is a series: 0+3+6+...+3(n−1).
This is an Arithmetic Progression (A.P.) with n terms.
First term a=0, Last term l=3(n−1).
Sum SN=2n(a+l)=2n(0+3(n−1))=23n(n−1).
Analyzing the Denominator
Now, let's look at the denominator: 2n4+4n+3−n4+5n+4.
We are evaluating the limit as n→∞.
In polynomials, the term with the highest power of n dominates the behavior at infinity.
Extracting the Dominant Term
The highest power inside the square roots is n4.
Let's factor out n4 from inside the radicals.
n4(2+n34+n43)−n4(1+n35+n44).
Taking n4 out of the square root gives n2.
Reconstructing the Limit Expression
Substitute the simplified numerator and denominator back into the limit.
limn→∞n2(2+n34+n43−1+n35+n44)23n(n−1).
Notice that the numerator has an n2 term if we expand 3n(n−1)=3n2−3n.
Dividing by the Highest Power
Divide both numerator and denominator by n2.
Numerator becomes: 23(1−n1).
Denominator becomes: 2+n34+n43−1+n35+n44.
Now, apply the limit n→∞.
Evaluating the Limit at Infinity
As n→∞, any term with n in the denominator goes to 0.
n1→0, n34→0, n43→0, etc.
The expression simplifies to: 2+0+0−1+0+023(1−0).
This equals 2(2−1)3.
Rationalizing the Final Answer
We have 2(2−1)3.
To match the options, we need to rationalize the denominator.
Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate (2+1).
2(2−1)3×2+12+1=2(2−1)3(2+1).
Final Result: 23(2+1).
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Evaluation of Limits & L'Hopital's Rule
Solution Diagram
Analyzing the Numerator
Finding Order in Chaos
The numerator is given by the expression 1+2−3+4+5−6+...+(3n−2)+(3n−1)−3n. At first glance, this appears to be a chaotic sequence, but there is a distinct rhythm where every third term is negative.
We group these terms into triplets. We define the k-th group as Gk=(3k−2)+(3k−1)−3k. Simplifying this, we find:
Gk=3k−3
For k=1, the value is 0. For k=2, the value is 3. For k=3, the value is 6. The sequence transforms into an arithmetic progression: 0+3+6+...+3(n−1).
Using the sum formula for an arithmetic progression, Sn=2n(a+l), the sum of the numerator becomes:
23n(n−1)
Analyzing the Denominator
The Power of Dominance
Now, we examine the denominator: 2n4+4n+3−n4+5n+4. As n→∞, the lower-order terms 4n,3,5n, and 4 become negligible compared to the n4 terms.
We factor out n4 from inside the radicals, which pulls out as n2:
n2(2+n34+n43−1+n35+n44)
As n→∞, the fractional terms approach zero. The expression simplifies to:
n2(2−1)
The Synthesis
Final Calculation
We now combine the simplified numerator and denominator to evaluate the limit:
n→∞limn2(2−1)23n(n−1)
The n2 terms cancel out, leaving us with the expression:
2(2−1)3
To reach the final answer, we rationalize the denominator by multiplying the numerator and denominator by (2+1):