Analyzing the Geometric Setup
We are given two complex numbers, z1 and z2, such that their magnitudes are equal: ∣z1∣=∣z2∣=r. Geometrically, this implies that both z1 and z2 lie on a circle of radius r centered at the origin.
The constraints Re(z1)>0 and Im(z2)<0 restrict z1 to the right half-plane and z2 to the lower half-plane. We are tasked with evaluating the ratio:
The Exponential Transformation
To simplify this expression, we represent the complex numbers in polar form: z1=reiθ1 and z2=reiθ2. Substituting these into the ratio, the radius r cancels out entirely:
Z=reiθ1−reiθ2reiθ1+reiθ2=eiθ1−eiθ2eiθ1+eiθ2
To proceed, we factor out the average angle ei(θ1+θ2)/2 from both the numerator and the denominator:
Z=ei(θ1+θ2)/2(ei(θ1−θ2)/2−e−i(θ1−θ2)/2)ei(θ1+θ2)/2(ei(θ1−θ2)/2+e−i(θ1−θ2)/2)
Simplifying via Euler's Identities
The exponential terms outside the parentheses cancel out. Applying Euler's identities, specifically eix+e−ix=2cos(x) and eix−e−ix=2isin(x), we obtain:
Z=2isin(2θ1−θ2)2cos(2θ1−θ2)
This simplifies to the following expression:
Geometric Interpretation and Edge Cases
Geometrically, z1 and z2 represent adjacent sides of a rhombus. The sum z1+z2 and the difference z1−z2 represent the diagonals of this rhombus, which are known to be perpendicular. A ratio of two perpendicular vectors is purely imaginary.
However, we must consider the edge case where the denominator z1−z2=0. This occurs if z1=z2, which is excluded by the quadrant constraints.
Another critical case is when the numerator z1+z2=0, which occurs if z1=−z2. Given the constraints, if z1 is in the first quadrant, −z1 lies in the third quadrant, which satisfies Im(z2)<0. In this specific scenario, the ratio becomes zero.
Thus, the value of the expression is purely imaginary or zero.