Analyzing the Setup
We begin with the given differential equation:
(x+1)y′−y=e3x(x+1)2
This equation is a classic example of a pattern waiting to be recognized. Observe the left-hand side: (x+1)y′−y. This structure is reminiscent of the quotient rule for differentiation, where the derivative of vu is v2vdu−udv.
The Master Equation
If we set u=y and v=x+1, then du=dy and dv=dx. The numerator of the quotient rule is exactly (x+1)dy−ydx.
To complete this pattern, we divide both sides of the original equation by
(x+1)2:
(x+1)2(x+1)y′−y=e3x
This simplifies the left side into the derivative of a quotient, yielding:
dxd(x+1y)=e3x
Solving the Integral
We now integrate both sides with respect to
x:
∫d(x+1y)=∫e3xdx
Performing the integration, we obtain:
x+1y=3e3x+C
Applying Initial Conditions
We are given the initial condition
y(0)=31. Substituting
x=0 and
y=31 into our general solution:
0+11/3=3e3(0)+C
This simplifies to
31=31+C, which clearly indicates that
C=0. Therefore, our specific solution is:
y(x)=31(x+1)e3x
Analyzing the Critical Point
To determine the nature of the point
x=−34, we first find the derivative
y′(x) using the product rule:
y′(x)=31(e3x+3(x+1)e3x)=3e3x(3x+4)
Setting
y′(x)=0 confirms the critical point at
3x+4=0, or
x=−34. To classify this point, we compute the second derivative:
y′′(x)=dxd[3e3x(3x+4)]=e3x(3x+5)
Evaluating the second derivative at
x=−34:
y′′(−34)=e−4(3(−34)+5)=e−4(−4+5)=e−4
Since e−4>0, the function is concave upwards at this point. Thus, the function has a local minimum at x=−34.