Analyzing the Setup
The given differential equation is:
(x2+xy+4x+2y+4)dxdy−y2=0
To simplify, we group the terms: x2+4x+4 is the perfect square (x+2)2, and xy+2y factors to y(x+2). The equation becomes:
The Pivot
Changing Perspectives
Solving for dxdy is inefficient. Instead, we invert the derivative to dydx:
Splitting the fraction yields:
Rearranging to isolate the linear term gives us a Bernoulli differential equation:
dydx−y1(x+2)=y21(x+2)2
The Transformation
Linearizing the Chaos
To linearize, we use the substitution u=(x+2)−1. Differentiating with respect to y gives:
Substituting this into our equation transforms the expression into a standard first-order linear differential equation:
The Integrating Factor (IF) is calculated as:
Multiplying the equation by the IF and integrating, we obtain:
Substituting u=x+21 back into the equation, we arrive at the general solution:
The Final Reveal
Intersection Analysis
Given the curve passes through (1,3), we substitute these values to find C:
1+23=−ln3+C⇒1=−ln3+C⇒C=1+ln3
The final equation of the curve is:
Testing the intersection with the line y=x+2:
1=1+ln(y3)⇒ln(y3)=0⇒y=3
Since y=x+2, we find x=1. The curve and the line intersect at exactly one point. Conversely, testing the parabola y=(x+3)2 shows that the growth rates are incompatible, meaning they never intersect.