Analyzing the Setup
We begin with the quadratic equation x2+px+q=0. We are given that x=2 is a root, which implies it must satisfy the equation:
Simplifying this, we obtain 4+2p+q=0. From this, we extract our golden ticket:
Keep this relation locked in your mind; we will need it to simplify the complex expression later.
The Beast Within the Cosine
Now, consider the function f(x) where the argument of the cosine function is x2−4px+q2+8q+16. At first glance, this appears to be a chaotic collection of variables. However, notice that the tail end, q2+8q+16, is a perfect square:
Recall our golden ticket: q=−2p−4, which implies q+4=−2p. Substituting this into our perfect square, we get:
The argument of the cosine function now becomes x2−4px+4p2. This is another perfect square, allowing the entire expression to collapse into:
The Limit and the Taylor Insight
Our function is now simplified to:
f(x)=(x−2p)41−cos((x−2p)2)
To make this manageable, let us define a new variable t=(x−2p)2. As x approaches 2p, t approaches 0 from the positive side. Our limit expression becomes:
We know the standard limit limt→0t21−cost=21. However, the question asks for the limit of the Greatest Integer Function [f(x)]. We must determine if f(t) approaches 1/2 from above or below.
Using the Taylor series expansion cost≈1−2!t2+4!t4−…, we substitute this into our function:
f(t)≈t21−(1−2t2+24t4)=21−24t2
Because t2 is always positive, we are subtracting a tiny positive value from 1/2. This confirms that f(t) is strictly less than 1/2.
The Final Stroke
We have established that as t approaches 0, f(t) approaches 1/2 from below. This implies that in the immediate neighborhood of the limit, the values of f(t) satisfy the inequality:
When we apply the Greatest Integer Function to any value in this interval, the result is always 0. The graph of this function shows a curve creeping up toward the line y=1/2 but never reaching it.
Therefore, the final answer is 0.