Animated Solution for Mathematics - Sets and Relations: Let R1 and R2 be two relation defined as follows: R1={(a,b)∈R2:a2+b2∈Q} and R2={(a,b)∈R2:a2+b2∈/Q}, where Q is the set of all rational numbers. Then:
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Defining R1 and R2
R1={(a,b)∈R2:a2+b2∈Q}
R2={(a,b)∈R2:a2+b2∈/Q}
Goal: Check if R1 and R2 are transitive.
Condition for Transitivity
A relation R is transitive if:
(a,b)∈R and (b,c)∈R⟹(a,c)∈R
To prove a relation is not transitive, we just need one counter-example.
Analyzing R1
For R1 to be transitive:
If a2+b2∈Q and b2+c2∈Q
Then a2+c2 must be in Q.
Counter-example for R1
Let a2=2
Let b2=2−2
Let c2=2
Note: b2>0, so b∈R
Checking (a,b) and (b,c)
a2+b2=2+(2−2)=2∈Q
⟹(a,b)∈R1
b2+c2=(2−2)+2=2∈Q
⟹(b,c)∈R1
Checking (a,c) for R1
Now check (a,c):
a2+c2=2+2=22
22∈/Q (Irrational)
Since (a,c)∈/R1, R1 is not transitive.
Analyzing R2
For R2 to be transitive:
If a2+b2∈/Q and b2+c2∈/Q
Then a2+c2 must be ∈/Q.
Counter-example for R2
Let a2=1
Let b2=2
Let c2=1
Checking (a,b) and (b,c)
a2+b2=1+2∈/Q⟹(a,b)∈R2
b2+c2=2+1∈/Q⟹(b,c)∈R2
Checking (a,c) for R2
Now check (a,c):
a2+c2=1+1=2
2∈Q (Rational)
Since (a,c)∈/R2, R2 is not transitive.
Final Conclusion
R1 is not transitive.
R2 is not transitive.
Final Answer: Neither R1 nor R2 is transitive.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Types of Relations
Solution Diagram
The Art of the Counter-Example
Unraveling Transitivity
Welcome, my dear students. Today, we are not just solving a problem; we are embarking on a journey into the heart of logical relations. In the JEE Advanced arena, you will often encounter questions that test your ability to think critically about definitions.
We are given two relations, R1 and R2, defined on the set of real numbers R. Our mission is to determine if they are transitive. Let us peel back the layers of this problem together.
Defining the Battlefield
First, let us look at our definitions. We have:
R1={(a,b)∈R2:a2+b2∈Q}
R2={(a,b)∈R2:a2+b2otinQ}
Essentially, R1 is the 'Rational Sum' relation, and R2 is the 'Irrational Sum' relation. To check for transitivity, we must recall the golden rule: a relation R is transitive if, for any three elements a,b,c, the existence of the pairs (a,b)∈R and (b,c)∈R implies that the pair (a,c) must also be in R.
Think of it as a bridge. If you can walk from a to b, and from b to c, can you jump directly from a to c? If you can find even one scenario where the bridge from a to c collapses, the relation is not transitive.
Dismantling R1
The Rational Trap
Let us focus on R1. We need to see if a2+b2∈Q and b2+c2∈Q forces a2+c2∈Q.
I want you to imagine we are constructing a counter-example. We want the first two conditions to be true, but the final condition to fail. Let us pick a2=2 and c2=2.
If we do this, then a2+c2=22, which is clearly irrational! We have already broken the final condition. Now, we just need to find a b2 that makes the first two conditions work. Let b2=2−2.
Let us check our work:
1. For (a,b): a2+b2=2+(2−2)=2. Since 2∈Q, (a,b)∈R1. Success!
2. For (b,c): b2+c2=(2−2)+2=2. Since 2∈Q, (b,c)∈R1. Success!
But look at the final link (a,c): a2+c2=2+2=22. This is irrational! Therefore, $(a, c)
otin R_1$. The bridge has collapsed. R1 is not transitive.
Dismantling R2
The Irrational Paradox
Now, let us turn our attention to R2. The condition is that the sum of squares must be irrational. We need to find a case where (a,b)∈R2 and (b,c)∈R2, but $(a, c)
otin R_2$.
Let us try a different strategy. We want a2+c2 to be rational (to break the condition). Let a2=1 and c2=1. Then a2+c2=2, which is rational.
Now, we need a b2 such that a2+b2 and b2+c2 are both irrational. Let b2=2.
Let us verify:
1. For (a,b): a2+b2=1+2. This is irrational, so (a,b)∈R2.
2. For (b,c): b2+c2=2+1. This is also irrational, so (b,c)∈R2.
But for the final link (a,c): a2+c2=1+1=2. Since 2 is rational, $(a, c)
otin R_2$. Again, the bridge is broken! R2 is not transitive.
The Final Verdict
My friends, what have we learned? We have learned that in the world of mathematics, intuition can be a dangerous guide. We might have assumed that these relations were transitive, but by carefully constructing counter-examples, we proved that neither R1 nor R2 holds the property of transitivity.
Always remember: to disprove a general statement, you do not need a complex proof; you only need one well-chosen example. Keep this spirit of inquiry alive, and you will conquer any problem the JEE throws at you!