Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are an architect, but instead of steel and glass, you are building with the pure, abstract logic of algebra. You are given a blueprint: a quadratic polynomial P(x)=x2+bx+c.
You know the shape—a parabola—but its exact position in the coordinate plane is hidden, masked by the unknown coefficients b and c. To find them, we must look at the two constraints provided by the problem.
The First Constraint
The Integral
Our first piece of information is the integral: ∫01P(x)dx=1. This is a geometric requirement stating that the area trapped between our parabola, the x-axis, and the vertical lines x=0 and x=1 must be exactly 1 square unit.
To unlock this, we perform the integration:
∫01(x2+bx+c)dx=[3x3+2bx2+cx]01=1
When we plug in the limits, the 0 vanishes, leaving us with the expression 31+2b+c=1. To simplify, we multiply the entire equation by 6 to clear the denominators.
This gives us our first structural pillar: 2+3b+6c=6, or more simply:
The Second Constraint
The Remainder Theorem
Now, we turn to the second constraint. We are told that when P(x) is divided by (x−2), the remainder is 5.
We invoke the Remainder Theorem, which states that the remainder of P(x)÷(x−a) is simply P(a). Thus, we have P(2)=5.
Substituting x=2 into our original polynomial, we get:
This is our second pillar. We now have a system of two linear equations: 3b+6c=4 and 2b+c=1.
The Final Synthesis
We are now at the climax of our problem. We have two equations and two unknowns. To solve this, we use the elimination method.
If we multiply our second equation by 6, we get 12b+6c=6. Now, we subtract the first equation from this new one:
With b in hand, finding c is a simple matter of substitution into 2b+c=1:
Finally, we calculate the value requested: 9(b+c).
The complexity collapses into the final answer of 7. You have successfully navigated the constraints, balanced the equations, and arrived at the truth.