The Dance of Continuity
Unmasking the Function
Welcome, future engineer. Today, we are not just solving a problem; we are peeling back the layers of a function that seems designed to confuse.
When you see a combination of the Greatest Integer Function [x] and the Modulus function ∣x∣, it is natural to feel a moment of hesitation. But remember, in the world of JEE Advanced, intimidation is just a signal that you are about to learn something profound.
Let us break down f(x)=[x2−x]+∣−x+[x]∣ step by step.
Phase 1
The Great Simplification
The first step in any complex problem is to simplify the landscape. We have a modulus term: ∣−x+[x]∣.
This looks messy, but let us look closer. If we factor out a negative sign, we get ∣−(x−[x])∣.
Now, recall the fundamental definition of the fractional part of x: {x}=x−[x]. This is the heartbeat of this function.
Substituting this in, our term becomes ∣−{x}∣. Since the absolute value of a negative number is the same as the absolute value of its positive counterpart, this is simply ∣{x}∣.
And here is the beauty: the fractional part {x} is, by definition, always in the interval [0,1). It is never negative!
Therefore, the modulus is redundant. We can strip it away entirely. Our function is now elegantly simplified to:
This is the key that unlocks the entire problem.
Phase 2
The Cliff at x=0
Now, let us investigate the behavior at x=0. First, we find the value of the function at the point:
But continuity requires the limit to match the value. We must check the Right Hand Limit (RHL) as x→0+.
Imagine x is a tiny positive number, like 0.001. What happens to x2−x?
Since x is very small, x2 is even smaller, making x2−x a small negative number (e.g., 0.000001−0.001=−0.000999).
The greatest integer of a number just below zero is −1. Meanwhile, the fractional part {x} as x→0+ is simply 0.
So, our RHL is −1+0=−1. Since the RHL (−1) does not equal the function value (0), the function is discontinuous at x=0.
Phase 3
The Balance at x=1
Do not let your guard down yet. We must check x=1. First, the value:
Now, for the limits. Let us look at the RHL as x→1+.
If x is slightly larger than 1 (e.g., 1.1), then x2 is significantly larger than x. Thus, x2−x is a small positive number.
The greatest integer of a small positive number is 0. The fractional part {x} as x→1+ is 0. So, the RHL is 0+0=0.
Now, the LHL as x→1−. If x is slightly less than 1 (e.g., 0.9), then x2 is smaller than x, making x2−x a small negative number.
The greatest integer of a small negative number is −1. However, the fractional part {x} as x→1− approaches 1.
When we add these together: −1+1=0. The LHL is 0, the RHL is 0, and the function value is 0. They all converge!
The function is continuous at x=1.
The Final Takeaway
We have navigated the traps. We saw how the function breaks at x=0 because the floor function drops to −1, and we saw how it heals at x=1 because the fractional part rises to 1, perfectly compensating for the floor function's drop.
This is the elegance of calculus—it is not just about calculation; it is about understanding the balance of forces. You have successfully analyzed the continuity of this function. Keep this analytical mindset, and no problem will ever be too daunting for you.