The Geometry of the Wave
Imagine you are standing on a calm, rolling ocean. The surface of the water follows a rhythmic pattern described by the function f(x)=2+cosx.
This is a cosine wave shifted upwards by two units. Because it is a simple cosine wave, it is perfectly smooth, continuous, and differentiable everywhere. There are no sharp corners or sudden breaks—just a gentle, infinite oscillation.
The Derivative
Finding the Peaks and Valleys
To understand the behavior of this function, we look at its rate of change. When we differentiate f(x)=2+cosx with respect to x, the constant 2 vanishes, and the derivative of cosx becomes −sinx.
We obtain the derivative function:
f′(x)=−sinx
This function f′(x) represents the slope of the tangent to our original curve at any point x. When f′(x)=0, the tangent is perfectly horizontal, identifying the peaks and valleys of our wave.
The Sliding Window of Length π
Statement-1 considers any interval [t,t+π]. Think of this as a sliding window of fixed length π moving along the x-axis. We want to determine if there is always a point c in this window where f′(c)=0.
The roots of our derivative are found by solving:
−sinc=0⇒sinc=0
From trigonometry, we know sinc=0 at every integer multiple of π, specifically c=nπ for n∈Z. These roots occur at 0,π,2π,3π,….
The distance between any two consecutive roots is exactly π. If you place a window of length π anywhere on the x-axis, it is mathematically impossible to avoid these roots; you are guaranteed to capture at least one of them. Thus, Statement-1 is true.
The Periodicity Trap
Now, consider Statement-2:
f(t)=f(t+2π). This is a fundamental property of the cosine function. Since
cos(t+2π)=cost, it follows that:
f(t+2π)=2+cos(t+2π)=2+cost=f(t)
This confirms that the function is periodic with a period of 2π. Therefore, Statement-2 is also true.
However, we must determine if Statement-2 is the correct explanation for Statement-1. Does a period of 2π automatically guarantee a root of the derivative in every interval of length π?
Consider a function with a period of 2π that remains very flat for most of the interval and changes rapidly only in a small region. Such a function would satisfy the periodicity condition but might not have a derivative root in every sub-interval of length π.
Rolle's Theorem only guarantees a root in an interval of length 2π (the period). It does not provide the guarantee for a smaller interval of length π.
The truth of Statement-1 relies on the specific, rigid spacing of the roots of the sine function, not just the general property of periodicity. Therefore, while both statements are true, Statement-2 is not the correct explanation for Statement-1.