Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing on a number line, looking at a function that changes its personality at three specific gates: x=0, x=1, and x=2. This is the essence of a piecewise function.
It is not just one equation; it is a collection of rules that dictate behavior in different territories. Our goal is to ensure this function is as smooth as possible, or at least understand where it breaks.
Phase 1
The Exponential Staircase
Let us start in the region where x<0. Here, f(x)=[ex].
As x becomes more and more negative, ex gets closer to 0 but never reaches it. For all x<0, ex is a fraction between 0 and 1.
The greatest integer function, denoted by [t], is a ruthless floor function; it rounds everything down to the nearest integer. Since 0<ex<1, the floor of ex is always 0. So, for the entire left side of the y-axis, our function is just a flat line at y=0.
Now, consider the region 0≤x<1. Here, f(x)=aex+[x−1].
If x is between 0 and 1, then x−1 is between −1 and 0. The greatest integer of any number in this range is −1. Thus, this branch simplifies to f(x)=aex−1.
Phase 2
The First Junction at x=0
To have continuity at x=0, the path from the left must meet the path from the right. From the left, the limit is 0.
From the right, we evaluate:
f(0)=ae0−1=a−1
For these to meet, we must have a−1=0, which forces a=1. This is our first anchor point.
Phase 3
The Inevitable Break at x=1
Now we approach the most treacherous part of the problem:
x=1. The left-hand limit is:
x→1−lim(aex−1)=ae−1
Since we know a=1, this is e−1. The function value at x=1 is f(1)=b+[sin(π)]=b+0=b.
The right-hand limit is limx→1+(b+[sin(πx)]). For x just slightly larger than 1, πx is slightly larger than π, putting it in the third quadrant where sine is negative.
Specifically, sin(πx) is between −1 and 0, so its greatest integer is −1. Thus, the right-hand limit is b−1.
Look at the values: f(1)=b and the right-hand limit is b−1. Can b ever equal b−1? Absolutely not. This is a permanent, unavoidable jump discontinuity.
Phase 4
The Final Junction at x=2
Finally, we look at x=2. The left-hand limit is b−1.
The right-hand limit is f(2)=[e−2]−c. Since e−2 is a tiny positive fraction, its greatest integer is 0. So, the right-hand limit is −c.
For continuity at x=2, we need b−1=−c, which rearranges to b+c=1.
The Conclusion
We have established that f(x) is always discontinuous at x=1. If the problem asks for the condition where f is discontinuous at exactly one point, it implies that x=1 is that point, and the function must be continuous at x=0 and x=2.
This requires
a=1 and
b+c=1. Adding these together:
a+b+c=1+1=2
Since $2
eq 1$, we have successfully proven that if the function has exactly one discontinuity, the sum a+b+c cannot be 1. You have navigated the traps, simplified the greatest integer functions, and emerged with a clear, logical result.