Analyzing the Setup
To solve the inequality f(g(3(α−1)2))>f(g(α−35)), we must first understand the behavior of the constituent functions. We are given:
The key to unlocking this problem lies in the concept of monotonicity. If we determine whether these functions are strictly increasing or strictly decreasing, the inequality will simplify significantly.
Analyzing the Outer Function f(x)
To understand the motion of f(x), we calculate its derivative:
f′(x)=dxd(loge(x2+1))−dxd(e−x)=x2+12x+e−x
For x≥0, both terms are clearly positive. For x<0, let x=−t where t>0. The derivative becomes:
Since t2+1≥2t (by AM-GM inequality), we know that t2+12t≤1. Because et>1 for all t>0, the derivative f′(x) is always positive. Thus, f(x) is strictly increasing for all real numbers.
Simplifying the Inequality
Because f is strictly increasing, we can remove it from both sides of the inequality without changing the direction of the inequality sign:
Now, we analyze g(x). Simplifying the expression, we get:
The derivative is:
Since both terms are negative, g′(x)<0 for all x. Therefore, g(x) is strictly decreasing.
The Final Calculation
When we remove a strictly decreasing function from an inequality, the inequality sign must flip. Our inequality transforms as follows:
Multiplying by 3 yields:
Expanding the left side and rearranging the terms:
Factoring the quadratic expression:
Since the quadratic is less than zero, α must lie between the roots 2 and 3. Thus, the final solution is: