Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, fellow traveler in the realm of linear algebra. Today, we are going to dismantle a problem that, at first glance, looks like a tedious exercise in matrix exponentiation.
You see a sum of powers of A up to A20, and your instinct might be to panic. But wait—take a breath. In JEE Advanced, the complexity is often a mask for a beautiful, underlying simplicity. Let us peel back that mask together.
The Discovery of the Generator
We are given the matrix A=[02−20]. Whenever you see a matrix with zeros on the diagonal and anti-symmetric off-diagonal elements, your intuition should scream 'rotation' or 'cyclic behavior.'
Let us test this by calculating the square of A:
A2=[02−20][02−20]=[−400−4]=−4I
Do you see it? A2 is not just any matrix; it is a scalar multiple of the identity matrix I. This is our 'Golden Key.'
Because A2=−4I, any higher power of A will collapse into a simple scalar multiple of either I or A. This observation transforms a nightmare of matrix multiplication into a simple geometric series problem.
Simplifying the Sums
Now, let us look at M=∑k=110A2k. Since A2k=(A2)k=(−4I)k=(−4)kI, we can factor out the identity matrix:
Let λ=∑k=110(−4)k. This is just a number—a scalar. So, M=λI.
Similarly, for N=∑k=110A2k−1, we can factor out one A:
N=Aj=0∑9A2j=Aj=0∑9(−4)jI=(j=0∑9(−4)j)A
Let μ=∑j=09(−4)j. Now we have N=μA. The entire complexity of the original matrices has been reduced to two simple scalar-matrix products.
The Final Synthesis
We are tasked with finding the nature of MN2. Substituting our simplified forms:
Since I is the identity, I⋅A2=A2. And we know A2=−4I. Thus:
Let k=−4λμ2. We have arrived at MN2=kI.
The Conclusion
What is the nature of kI? By definition, a matrix is symmetric if it equals its own transpose.
Since (kI)T=kIT=kI, any scalar multiple of the identity matrix is symmetric. Because k is clearly not 1, we have successfully proven that MN2 is a non-identity symmetric matrix.
Isn't it elegant? We started with a daunting sum of matrix powers and ended with the realization that the entire expression is just a scaled version of the identity. Keep this perspective in your toolkit: whenever you see high powers of a matrix, look for a pattern that reduces it to the identity. You have mastered this concept today!