Analyzing the Setup
The greatest integer function, denoted as [x], behaves like a staircase. It remains constant between integers and leaps at every integer value.
When evaluating the integral
we must recognize that the function is piecewise constant. We cannot treat it as a single monolithic entity; instead, we must partition the interval [0,5] into unit steps: [0,1),[1,2),[2,3),[3,4), and [4,5).
The Strategy of Partitioning
In each interval [k,k+1), the value of [x] is exactly k. This allows us to decompose the integral into a summation of five manageable parts:
This transformation turns an intimidating expression into a structured sum of simpler integrals.
The Beauty of Substitution
To simplify the integrand, we perform the substitution t=x−k, which implies dx=dt. The limits of integration transform from [k,k+1] to [0,1].
The numerator x+k becomes (t+k)+k=t+2k, and the denominator becomes et. The integral expression now becomes:
By choosing this substitution, we have successfully aligned all five intervals to the same range [0,1], making the variable t independent of the index k.
The Art of Summation
Because the integral and the finite sum are linear operators, we can swap their order. We pull the summation inside the integral:
I=∫01e−t(k=0∑4(t+2k))dt
Calculating the inner sum, we find ∑k=04t=5t and ∑k=042k=2(0+1+2+3+4)=20. The integral simplifies to:
I=∫01(5t+20)e−tdt=5∫01(t+4)e−tdt
The Final Integration
We solve the remaining integral using integration by parts, where ∫udv=uv−∫vdu. Let u=t+4 and dv=e−tdt, which gives du=dt and v=−e−t.
The antiderivative is:
−(t+4)e−t−∫−e−tdt=−(t+4)e−t−e−t=−e−t(t+5)
Evaluating this from 0 to 1:
I=5[−e−t(t+5)]01=5((−6e−1)−(−5))=25−30e−1
Comparing this to the form αe−1+β, we identify α=−30 and β=25. The final result is:
(α+β)2=(−30+25)2=(−5)2=∗∗25∗∗