Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing in a vast, three-dimensional room. You have three planes, each defined by a linear equation. Usually, these three planes intersect at a single, beautiful point—a unique solution.
But today, we are looking for a scenario where these planes refuse to meet. We are hunting for the value of λ that makes the system inconsistent.
The Gatekeeper
The Determinant
Our first step is to identify the 'gatekeeper' of the system: the determinant of the coefficient matrix, Δ. If $\Delta
eq 0$, the planes intersect at a unique point.
To ensure the system has no solution, we must force Δ=0. Let us construct our matrix:
Expanding this along the first row, we get:
2(∣λ∣−(−1))−3(∣λ∣−1)−1(−1−1)=0
Simplifying this, we find:
This leads us to −∣λ∣+7=0, or simply ∣λ∣=7. This is our critical threshold.
The Modulus Trap
Now, we have two candidates: λ=7 and λ=−7. Many students stop here, but this is where the real algebra begins. We must test these candidates to ensure the system is truly inconsistent.
Let us look at λ=7 first. Substituting λ=7 into our third equation, x−y+∣λ∣z=4λ−4, we get x−y+7z=24.
If we perform elimination on the system, we find that the equations are consistent, leading to infinitely many solutions. That is not what we want.
The Contradiction
Now, let us test λ=−7. Substituting this into the third equation, we get x−y+7z=−32.
When we eliminate y using the first two equations, we get x+4z=14. When we eliminate y using the second and third equations, we get x+4z=−14.
Look at that! We have x+4z=14 and x+4z=−14. This is a blatant mathematical contradiction, as $14
eq -14$.
This contradiction proves that the planes are positioned such that they never share a common intersection. The system is inconsistent.
We have found our answer: λ=−7.