Analyzing the Setup
We are given two fundamental logical constraints. First, we know that q is false, denoted as q=F.
Second, we are given that the biconditional statement (p∧q)↔r is true. These two pieces of information serve as our anchor points for the entire logical derivation.
The Logic of the Biconditional
We begin by substituting the known value q=F into the expression (p∧q)↔r≡T.
Applying the identity law of logic, we know that any statement
p conjoined with false results in false:
(p∧F)≡F
Consequently, the expression simplifies to:
F↔r≡T
The biconditional operator ↔ requires both sides to have the same truth value to result in true. Since the left side is F, the right side r must also be F for the entire statement to hold true.
Thus, we have determined that r=F.
The Tautology Hunt
We now evaluate the candidate expression
(p∧r)→(p∨r) to determine if it is a tautology. Substituting our derived value
r=F, the expression becomes:
(p∧F)→(p∨F)
We simplify the components using basic logical identities. On the left side, (p∧F) simplifies to F. On the right side, (p∨F) simplifies to p.
The expression now reduces to:
F→p
The Beauty of Vacuous Truth
In formal logic, an implication A→B is only false when the hypothesis A is true and the conclusion B is false. If the hypothesis A is false, the implication is automatically true, regardless of the truth value of B.
This phenomenon is known as a vacuous truth. Since our hypothesis is F, the statement F→p is true for any value of p.
Therefore, the expression (p∧r)→(p∨r) is a tautology.