Understanding the Logical Fortress
In Boolean logic, a tautology is a statement that remains true regardless of the truth values of its constituent variables. While truth tables are a reliable method, they are often tedious. Instead, we utilize algebraic laws such as the Distributive Law, the Associative Law, and the Law of Excluded Middle (p∨∼p=T) to simplify expressions.
Analyzing Option 1
We begin with the expression:
(p∨q)∧(∼p∨∼q)
To test for a tautology, we check the case where p=T and q=T:
1. The first bracket becomes (T∨T)=T.
2. The second bracket becomes (∼T∨∼T)=(F∨F)=F.
3. The total expression results in (T∧F)=F.
Since the expression evaluates to False in this instance, Option 1 is not a tautology.
Analyzing Option 2
Next, we examine the expression:
(p∧q)∨(p∧∼q)
Using the
Distributive Law, we factor out the common term
p∧:
p∧(q∨∼q)
Since
(q∨∼q)=T, the expression simplifies to:
p∧T=p
Because the result depends on the value of p, Option 2 is not a tautology.
Analyzing Option 3
We now look at the expression:
(p∨q)∧(p∨∼q)
Applying the
Distributive Law by factoring out
p∨, we obtain:
p∨(q∧∼q)
Since
(q∧∼q)=F (a contradiction), the expression simplifies to:
p∨F=p
Again, the result is tethered to the value of p, so Option 3 is not a tautology.
The Final Solution
Option 4
Finally, we evaluate the expression:
(p∨q)∨(∼p∨∼q)
Since all operators are 'OR' (
∨), we apply the
Associative Law to remove the brackets:
p∨q∨∼p∨∼q
Using the
Commutative Law to rearrange the terms, we group the variables with their negations:
(p∨∼p)∨(q∨∼q)
Applying the
Law of Excluded Middle, we find:
T∨T=T
Because the expression evaluates to True for all possible values of p and q, Option 4 is the tautology.