Analyzing the Setup
The expression provided is (p∧∼q)∧(p∧r)→∼p∨q. We are given that this entire logical statement evaluates to False.
In formal logic, an implication A→B is False if and only if the antecedent A is True and the consequent B is False.
This gives us two critical conditions:
1. The antecedent (p∧∼q)∧(p∧r) must be True.
2. The consequent ∼p∨q must be False.
Deconstructing the Consequent
We begin with the consequent, ∼p∨q, because it provides the most restrictive constraints. An OR (∨) operation is False only when both components are False.
Therefore, we must have:
1. ∼p=F⇒p=T
2. q=F
By analyzing the consequent, we have already determined that p is True and q is False.
The Antecedent's Demand
Now we examine the antecedent: (p∧∼q)∧(p∧r). For this conjunction to be True, both (p∧∼q) and (p∧r) must be True.
Let us verify the first part with our known values:
(p∧∼q)=(T∧∼F)=(T∧T)=T
This confirms our values for
p and
q are consistent with the antecedent.
Now, we evaluate the second part:
(p∧r). Since we know
p=T, the expression becomes:
(T∧r)=T
For this to hold true,
r must be True.
Final Conclusion
By methodically applying the rules of logical operators, we have isolated the truth values for each variable.
The values that satisfy the condition are:
p=T
q=F
r=T
The final sequence of truth values is (T,F,T).