Analyzing the Setup
Today, we are exploring the fundamental properties of real numbers using three points: p, q, and r. Our goal is to identify the universal truth among the provided options by testing their validity across different scenarios.
Dismantling the Traps
Option A suggests that max(p,q)<max(p,q,r). Let us test this with a counter-example by setting p=5, q=3, and r=2.
In this case, max(5,3)=5 and max(5,3,2)=5. Since 5 is not strictly less than 5, this option is proven false.
Option C claims that max(p,q)<min(p,q,r). This is conceptually impossible because the minimum of a set is always less than or equal to any element within that set. Therefore, it can never be greater than the maximum of a subset.
The Master Identity
The core of this problem lies in the identity:
This formula acts as a geometric map. The term 2p+q represents the midpoint, while ∣p−q∣ represents the distance between the two points. To find the minimum, we start at the midpoint and subtract half the distance.
Proof of the Identity
We can verify this identity by considering two cases:
If p<q, then ∣p−q∣=q−p. Substituting this into the formula, we get:
If p>q, then ∣p−q∣=p−q. Substituting this into the formula, we get:
Final Conclusion
The identity holds true in all cases, making it a powerful tool in your JEE arsenal. As a useful corollary, remember that the maximum can be expressed similarly:
By visualizing these relationships on the number line, you can master these concepts and solve complex inequalities with ease.