Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing on the edge of a mathematical landscape, looking at the function f(x). We are told two vital things: it is differentiable, meaning it is smooth and continuous, and it is strictly increasing, meaning it is always climbing.
We are tasked with evaluating the limit:
x→0limf(x)−f(0)f(x2)−f(x)
At first glance, this looks like a daunting ratio, but let us break it down with the precision of a surgeon.
The Indeterminate Trap
Before we panic, let us test the waters. If we substitute x=0 directly into our expression, we get:
f(0)−f(0)f(02)−f(0)=f(0)−f(0)f(0)−f(0)=00
This is the classic indeterminate form. It is not a dead end; it is an invitation to use L'Hospital's Rule. We are essentially looking for the rate at which the numerator vanishes compared to the denominator.
The Power of L'Hospital's Rule
Since we have a 00 form, we can differentiate the numerator and the denominator separately. This is where the Chain Rule becomes our most trusted ally.
For the numerator, we calculate:
dxd[f(x2)−f(x)]=f′(x2)⋅2x−f′(x)
For the denominator, we calculate:
Since f(0) is a constant, its derivative is zero.
The Final Calculation
Now, we look at our new limit:
x→0limf′(x)2x⋅f′(x2)−f′(x)
As x approaches zero, the term 2x⋅f′(x2) vanishes because 2(0)=0. We are left with:
This is where the condition of being 'strictly increasing' saves us. Because f(x) is strictly increasing, f′(0) must be greater than zero.
It is not zero, which means we can safely divide the numerator by the denominator. The f′(0) terms cancel out perfectly, leaving us with the elegant result of −1.