Animated Solution for Mathematics - Definite Integration: If a=limn→∞∑k=1nn2+k22n and f(x)=1+cosx1−cosx,x∈(0,1), then :
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Understanding the Limit of a Sum
Given: a=limn→∞∑k=1nn2+k22n
Objective: Convert the limit of the sum into a definite integral form.
Rearranging for Riemann Sum Form
Divide numerator and denominator by n2:
n2+k22n=1+(k/n)22/n
Rewrite the sum: a=limn→∞∑k=1nn1⋅1+(k/n)22
Converting to Definite Integral
Substitute: nk→x, n1→dx
Limits: x→0 as k=1, x→1 as k=n
Integral form: a=∫011+x22dx
Evaluating the Integral for a
a=2[tan−1x]01
Substitute limits: a=2(tan−1(1)−tan−1(0))
a=2(4π−0)=2π
Simplifying the Function f(x)
f(x)=1+cosx1−cosx
Use identities: 1−cosx=2sin2(2x) and 1+cosx=2cos2(2x)
f(x)=tan2(2x)=tan(2x) for x∈(0,1)
Differentiating f(x)
Differentiate f(x)=tan(2x) with respect to x:
f′(x)=sec2(2x)⋅dxd(2x)
f′(x)=21sec2(2x)
Evaluating f(a/2)
We need to evaluate at x=2a
Since a=2π, x=4π
f(2a)=tan(2π/4)=tan(8π)
Value: tan(8π)=2−1
Evaluating f′(a/2)
f′(2a)=21sec2(8π)=2cos2(π/8)1
Using 2cos2θ=1+cos2θ:
f′(2a)=1+cos(π/4)1=1+1/21
f′(2a)=2+12=2(2−1)
Establishing the Relationship
We have: f(2a)=2−1
And: f′(2a)=2(2−1)
Comparing the two: f′(2a)=2f(2a)
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Definite Integral as a Limit of a Sum
Solution Diagram
The Symphony of Calculus
From Discrete Sums to Elegant Derivatives
Welcome, future engineers! Today, we are going to dissect a problem that is a perfect microcosm of the JEE Advanced experience. It tests your ability to recognize patterns, your mastery of trigonometric identities, and your precision in calculus.
This problem is not just about finding an answer; it is about seeing the hidden connections between different branches of mathematics.
Phase 1
The Riemann Sum - Turning Discrete into Continuous
Let us look at the first part of our challenge: a=limn→∞∑k=1nn2+k22n. When you see a limit of a summation as n goes to infinity, your intuition should immediately scream 'Riemann Sum!'
We are essentially summing up the areas of infinitely many, infinitely thin rectangles to find the area under a curve. To unlock this, we need to force the expression into the form ∑f(k/n)⋅(1/n).
Let us manipulate the term n2+k22n. If we divide both the numerator and the denominator by n2, we get:
(n2+k2)/n22n/n2=1+(k/n)22/n
Now, the structure becomes clear. We have a term (1/n) which acts as our dx, and a function of (k/n). The summation becomes an integral from 0 to 1 (since k/n ranges from 1/n to n/n, which is 0 to 1 as n→∞).
Thus, our expression transforms into:
a=∫011+x22dx
This is a standard integral! The antiderivative of 1+x21 is tan−1(x). So, we have a=2[tan−1(x)]01.
Evaluating this, we get 2(tan−1(1)−tan−1(0))=2(π/4−0)=π/2. We have successfully tamed the limit!
Phase 2
The Trigonometric Simplification
Now, we turn our attention to the function f(x)=1+cosx1−cosx. Many students would immediately reach for the quotient rule and the chain rule here, but that is a path to algebraic misery.
Remember, in trigonometry, identities are your best friends. Recall the half-angle identities: 1−cosx=2sin2(x/2) and 1+cosx=2cos2(x/2).
Substituting these into our function, we get:
f(x)=2cos2(x/2)2sin2(x/2)=tan2(x/2)
Since x∈(0,1), x/2 is in the first quadrant, so tan(x/2) is positive. Thus, f(x)=tan(x/2). Look at how much cleaner that is!
We have reduced a complex radical expression into a simple tangent function.
Phase 3
The Derivative and the Final Connection
Now, we need to find the relationship between f(a/2) and f′(a/2). First, let us find the derivative f′(x).
Differentiating tan(x/2) with respect to x gives us:
f′(x)=sec2(x/2)⋅dxd(x/2)=21sec2(x/2)
We know a=π/2, so a/2=π/4. Let us evaluate our function and its derivative at this point.
For the function: f(π/4)=tan(π/8)=2−1.
For the derivative: f′(π/4)=21sec2(π/8)=2cos2(π/8)1.
Here is a beautiful trick. Use the identity 2cos2(θ)=1+cos(2θ).
So, 2cos2(π/8)=1+cos(π/4)=1+1/2=22+1.
Therefore, f′(π/4)=(2+1)/21=2+12.
Rationalizing the denominator by multiplying by (2−1), we get:
f′(π/4)=2(2−1)
Comparing this to our function value f(π/4)=2−1, we see the elegant relationship: f′(π/4)=2f(π/4).
This matches our third option perfectly! You see, the problem wasn't about brute force; it was about recognizing the structure of the limit, simplifying the trigonometry, and carefully applying the chain rule.