The Intimidating Limit
Imagine you are staring at this problem on your JEE Advanced paper. You see a limit as n approaches infinity, a summation, a logarithm, and a tangent function all tangled together. It looks like a nightmare of complexity.
But here is the secret: in the world of competitive mathematics, complexity is often just a mask for elegance. Let us peel back that mask together.
We are given the expression:
E=n→∞limn2r=1∑nlog2(1+tan(4nπr))
At first glance, you might be tempted to try and expand the sum or look for a pattern in the terms. Resist that urge! The presence of n1 outside the sum and nr inside the function is a massive, flashing neon sign pointing toward the Riemann Sum definition.
The Riemann Bridge
Recall the fundamental definition of a definite integral as the limit of a Riemann sum:
n→∞limn1r=1∑ng(nr)=∫01g(x)dx
In our expression, we have a factor of n2. We can simply pull the constant 2 outside the limit.
Now, the remaining part n1∑f(nr) maps perfectly to the integral definition. Our discrete variable nr transforms into the continuous variable x, and the n1 becomes our differential dx.
The limits of integration, as r goes from 1 to n, naturally span from 0 to 1. Suddenly, our infinite sum has collapsed into a clean, definite integral:
E=2∫01log2(1+tan(4πx))dx
The King's Property
Now, look at the integrand. Can you integrate log2(1+tan(4πx)) directly? It is not impossible, but it is certainly not straightforward.
This is where we invoke the 'King' of definite integration properties:
This property is your best friend when dealing with trigonometric functions in definite integrals. Let us apply it here, where a=1. We replace every x with (1−x):
E=2∫01log2(1+tan(4π(1−x)))dx
The Algebraic Dance
Now, we must simplify the argument of the tangent function. Distributing the 4π, we get 4π−4πx.
We use the trigonometric identity for the tangent of a difference, tan(A−B)=1+tanAtanBtanA−tanB. Since tan(4π)=1, the expression simplifies beautifully:
tan(4π−4πx)=1+tan(4πx)1−tan(4πx)
Now, substitute this back into our logarithm argument:
1+1+tan(4πx)1−tan(4πx)=1+tan(4πx)1+tan(4πx)+1−tan(4πx)=1+tan(4πx)2
The Grand Finale
Look at what we have achieved! Our integral now looks like this:
E=2∫01log2(1+tan(4πx)2)dx
Using the quotient rule for logarithms, log(ba)=loga−logb, we can split this into two parts:
E=2∫01(log22−log2(1+tan(4πx)))dx
Since log22=1, we can distribute the integral:
E=2∫011dx−2∫01log2(1+tan(4πx))dx
The second term is exactly our original integral E! We have arrived at the equation:
Solving for E is trivial now: 2E=2, which means E=1. What started as a terrifying infinite sum has been reduced to the integer 1 through the sheer power of symmetry and algebraic manipulation.