Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing in a 3D coordinate system. You have three planes, each defined by an equation:
x+y+z=6
x+2y+az=10
x+3y+5z=β
These are physical surfaces in space. Our goal is to determine how they interact: whether they meet at a single point, form a line of intersection, or never meet at all.
The Gatekeeper, Δ
To understand the behavior of this system, we must first look at the coefficient matrix. We define the primary determinant, Δ, as:
This determinant is the "gatekeeper." If $\Delta
eq 0$, the system is well-behaved and possesses a unique solution. If Δ=0, the system is singular, and we enter the territory of infinite solutions or no solutions.
Let us expand this determinant carefully along the first row:
Δ=1(2×5−3×a)−1(1×5−1×a)+1(1×3−1×2)
Simplifying this, we get:
Combining the terms, we find Δ=10−3a−5+a+1, which simplifies to:
For a unique solution, we require $\Delta
eq 0$, which implies $6 - 2a
eq 0$, or simply $a
eq 3$.
The Critical Fork in the Road
What happens when a=3? This is the moment of truth. When a=3, our determinant Δ vanishes, becoming zero, and the system becomes singular.
We must now determine if it is inconsistent (no solution) or dependent (infinitely many solutions). We invoke Cramer's Rule and calculate Δx, where we replace the first column of the coefficient matrix with the constants from the right-hand side:
Expanding this:
Δx=6(10−9)−1(50−3β)+1(30−2β)
Simplifying further:
The constants are 6−50+30=−14, and the variables are 3β−2β=β. Thus:
The Verdict
If β=14, then Δx=0. Since Δ=0 and Δx=0 (and similarly Δy=Δz=0), the system has infinitely many solutions.
If $\beta
eq 14$, then $\Delta_x
eq 0$. Since Δ=0 but $\Delta_x
eq 0$, the system is inconsistent and has no solution.
Regarding the claim that the "System has a unique solution for $a = 3, \beta
eq 14$": we have proven that when a=3, Δ is zero. A unique solution is mathematically impossible when the determinant is zero. Therefore, this statement is fundamentally false.