Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing in a football locker room. There are fifteen players and fifteen T-shirts, each bearing a player's name on the back. Chaos ensues as everyone grabs a shirt at random.
You are asked: what is the probability that at least three players end up with their own shirt? This is a classic encounter with the concept of derangements, and it holds a beautiful mathematical secret.
The Strategy
Working Smarter, Not Harder
When faced with the prospect of calculating the probability of at least three matches, your first instinct might be to calculate the probability for exactly three, then four, then five, and so on, all the way to fifteen. Stop! That is the trap.
In the world of probability, whenever you see "at least," your mind should immediately jump to the complement rule:
Here, the complement of "at least 3" is "fewer than 3." This means we only need to calculate the probabilities for X=0, X=1, and X=2. By finding these three values and subtracting their sum from 1, we bypass the tedious work of calculating the higher-order matches.
The Derangement Magic
To solve this, we need the derangement formula. A derangement is a permutation where no element appears in its original position. The probability of exactly r matches in a set of n items is given by:
When we expand the derangement term Dn−r as (n−r)!∑i=0n−ri!(−1)i, something magical happens. The n! and (n−r)! terms cancel out, leaving us with a remarkably clean expression:
P(X=r)=r!1i=0∑n−ri!(−1)i
The Poisson Connection
Now, look at that alternating sum. For a large n (and 15 is large enough for this approximation), the sum ∑i=0n−ri!(−1)i is the Taylor series expansion for e−1.
Thus, the probability of exactly r matches simplifies to:
This is the heart of the problem. It tells us that the probability of having r matches is inversely proportional to r! and the constant e.
The Final Calculation
Let's apply this to our cases:
For
r=0:
P(X=0)≈0!e1=e1
For
r=1:
P(X=1)≈1!e1=e1
For
r=2:
P(X=2)≈2!e1=2e1
Summing these up, we get:
The JEE Twist
Finally, we return to our complement rule:
If you look at the options provided, you will notice they are all simple fractions. This is the final hurdle. The exam setters expect you to use the approximation e≈3.
Substituting this into our result, we get:
And there it is—the elegance of the solution, hidden behind a clever approximation. You have navigated the trap, used the derangement formula, and arrived at the final answer of 61.