Imagine standing on a bridge over a deep, calm lake. You hold a small stone in your hand and let it drop. As it falls through the air, gravity accelerates it, and it gains speed. But the moment it pierces the surface of the water, the rules of the game change dramatically. The water pushes back. This pushback is the drag force, and in this problem, we are told it is directly proportional to the stone's velocity.
The Math of Drag
Let's translate this physical intuition into mathematics. Once the stone is submerged, there are two primary forces acting on it: the downward pull of gravity (mg) and the upward drag force (Fd​=kv). According to Newton's Second Law, the net force dictates the acceleration:
Dividing by the mass m, we get an expression for the acceleration:
This equation is the master key to the whole problem. Notice how the acceleration depends on the velocity v. As the stone speeds up, the term mk​v grows larger, which means the overall acceleration a gets smaller.
The Concept of Terminal Velocity
Eventually, if the stone falls long enough, the upward drag force will perfectly balance the downward gravitational force. When this happens, the net force becomes zero, and the acceleration drops to zero. The constant speed the stone achieves at this point is called the terminal velocity, denoted as v0​.
Setting a=0 in our equation gives:
0=g−mk​v0​⟹v0​=kmg​
We can use this elegant result to rewrite our acceleration equation. By substituting mk​=v0​g​, we get:
This form is incredibly powerful. It tells us immediately that the sign of the acceleration depends entirely on whether the current velocity v is greater than or less than the terminal velocity v0​.
Decoding the Graphs
Now, let's look at the three graphs provided and connect them to our physical scenarios.
Case 1: The High Drop (Graph 1)
Suppose you drop the stone from a very large height. By the time it hits the water, it has accelerated so much in the air that its entry speed u is greater than the terminal velocity in water (u>v0​).
Looking at our master equation, if v>v0​, the term (v0​−v) is negative, making the acceleration a negative. The drag force is actually stronger than gravity! The stone will rapidly decelerate, and its velocity curve will decay downwards, asymptotically approaching v0​. This perfectly matches Graph 1.
Case 2: The Low Drop (Graph 2)
What if you drop the stone from just a few inches above the water? Its entry speed u will be very low, certainly less than the terminal velocity (u<v0​).
Here, (v0​−v) is positive, so the acceleration a is positive. Gravity is winning the tug-of-war. The stone will continue to speed up in the water, but at a decreasing rate, until its velocity levels off at v0​. This upward curve is exactly what we see in Graph 2.
Case 3: The Perfect Drop (Graph 3)
Finally, imagine dropping the stone from a very specific, calculated height. It falls through the air and hits the water with an entry speed exactly equal to the terminal velocity (u=v0​).
In this magical scenario, (v0​−v)=0, so the acceleration is zero from the very first millisecond. The forces are perfectly balanced upon entry, and the stone simply cruises downward at a constant speed v0​. This horizontal line is depicted in Graph 3.
Conclusion
By analyzing the physics, we've deduced that Graph 1 corresponds to a large drop height, Graph 2 to a small drop height, and Graph 3 to a specific height that grants exactly the terminal velocity upon entry. Therefore, the explanations given in options (b) and (c) are both perfectly reasonable and correct.