Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing before a system of equations: ax+by=0 and cx+dy=0. At first glance, they look like any other pair of linear equations, but the right-hand side is zero. This is a homogeneous system.
In the world of linear algebra, this is a special place where the origin (0,0) is always a welcome guest. Because a(0)+b(0)=0 and c(0)+d(0)=0, the point (0,0) is always a solution.
This is what we call the trivial solution. Because this solution exists for any combination of a,b,c,d, the system is never inconsistent. It will always have at least one solution, which validates Statement 2.
The Gatekeeper
The Determinant
Now, let us pivot to Statement 1. We are asked about the probability of a unique solution. A homogeneous system has a unique solution if and only if the lines are not coincident, meaning they intersect at only one point—the origin.
This occurs if and only if the determinant of the coefficient matrix A is non-zero. We define the matrix and its determinant as:
Our condition for a unique solution is $\Delta
eq 0$, or $ad - bc
eq 0$. If the determinant is zero, the lines are coincident, and we have infinitely many solutions. If it is non-zero, the origin is the only solution.
The Combinatorial Dance
We have four variables: a,b,c,d. Each can be either 0 or 1, which gives us 24=16 possible matrices. We must count the favorable cases where $ad - bc
eq 0$.
Since a,b,c,d∈{0,1}, the products ad and bc can only be 0 or 1. For their difference to be non-zero, they must be different. This leaves us with two scenarios:
Case 1: ad=1 and bc=0.
For ad=1, we must have a=1 and d=1 (1 way). For bc=0, the pairs (b,c) can be (0,0),(0,1),(1,0) (3 ways). Thus, 1×3=3 favorable outcomes.
Case 2: ad=0 and bc=1.
For bc=1, we must have b=1 and c=1 (1 way). For ad=0, the pairs (a,d) can be (0,0),(0,1),(1,0) (3 ways). Thus, 1×3=3 favorable outcomes.
Adding these together, we have 3+3=6 favorable cases out of 16 total possibilities. The probability is:
The Final Verdict
We have proven that Statement 1 is true and Statement 2 is true. However, Statement 2 is a general property of homogeneous systems—a statement of existence.
Statement 1 is a specific calculation of uniqueness. Therefore, while both are true, Statement 2 is not the correct explanation for Statement 1. You have navigated the logic, counted the cases, and arrived at the truth.