Analyzing the Setup for (S1)
We are given the set {z∈C−{−i}:∣z∣=1 and z+iz−i is purely real}. The condition ∣z∣=1 constrains z to the unit circle, with the exclusion of the point z=−i.
For a complex number w=z+iz−i to be purely real, it must satisfy the condition w=w. This leads to the following equation:
Solving the Master Equation
By cross-multiplying the equation above, we obtain:
Expanding both sides of the equation yields:
The terms zz and −1 cancel out from both sides, simplifying the expression to:
Since $2i
eq 0$, we must have z+z=0, which implies that the real part of z is zero. Geometrically, z must lie on the imaginary axis.
Conclusion for (S1)
The intersection of the imaginary axis and the unit circle consists of the points i and −i. However, the problem explicitly excludes z=−i.
Therefore, the set contains only one element, z=i. Since the statement (S1) claims the set contains two elements, (S1) is incorrect.
The Elegance of Euler
Unlocking (S2)
We now examine the set {z∈C−{−1}:∣z∣=1 and z+1z−1 is purely imaginary}. We represent z on the unit circle using the Euler form z=eiθ, where $\theta
eq \pi$.
Substituting this into the expression, we get:
Factoring out eiθ/2 from the numerator and denominator, we simplify the expression:
eiθ/2(eiθ/2+e−iθ/2)eiθ/2(eiθ/2−e−iθ/2)=2cos(θ/2)2isin(θ/2)=itan(θ/2)
Final Verdict
Since tan(θ/2) is a real number for all valid θ, the expression itan(θ/2) is always purely imaginary. This condition holds for infinitely many values of θ in the interval $