Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing in a workshop. In front of you lies a rectangular sheet of paper. It is not just a piece of paper; it is a canvas of potential.
We are told the sides are in a ratio of 8:15. Let us define these sides as 8k and 15k. This constant k is our scaling factor, the hidden DNA of our rectangle.
The Act of Removal
To create this box, we must perform a surgical operation. We remove squares of equal area from all four corners. Let the side of each square be x.
We are given that the total area of these four squares is 100. Mathematically, this is 4x2=100, which simplifies beautifully to x2=25, giving us x=5.
We now know exactly how much we are cutting away. This is the first step in our journey: defining the constraints of our physical reality.
The Algebra of Folding
Now, visualize the folding process. When you fold up the flaps, the height of your box becomes x.
The original length was 15k. By cutting a square of side x from both ends, we have reduced the length by 2x. Thus, the new length is 15k−2x.
Similarly, the width becomes
8k−2x. The volume
V is the product of these three dimensions:
V(x)=(15k−2x)(8k−2x)x
The Calculus of Optimization
We want to maximize this volume. In the language of calculus, this means we need to find the point where the rate of change of volume with respect to the cutout size is zero.
Let us expand our volume function:
V(x)=(120k2−30kx−16kx+4x2)x
V(x)=4x3−46kx2+120k2x
Now, we differentiate with respect to
x:
dxdV=12x2−92kx+120k2
We know that the maximum volume occurs at x=5. Therefore, we set dxdV=0 at x=5.
The Reality Check
Substituting
x=5 into our derivative, we get:
12(25)−92k(5)+120k2=0
This simplifies to
300−460k+120k2=0. Dividing by
20, we arrive at the elegant quadratic equation:
6k2−23k+15=0
Factoring this, we find (6k−5)(k−3)=0. This gives us two potential values for k: k=65 or k=3.
Here is where the physics meets the math. If k=65, the width 8k is 640≈6.67.
Since we removed 2x=10 from the width, we cannot remove 10 units from a 6.67 unit side. Thus, we reject k=65 as physically impossible.
We are left with k=3. The dimensions of our sheet are 8(3)=24 and 15(3)=45. We have successfully navigated the geometry, the algebra, and the physical constraints to find our answer.