The Deep Sea Thought Experiment
Imagine a solid metal cube submerged deep in the Mariana Trench, or placed inside a high-pressure industrial chamber. It experiences a uniform squeezing force from all directions. This is what physicists call hydrostatic pressure.
When a material is subjected to such pressure, it doesn't just sit there; it compresses. The extent to which it resists this compression is governed by a property known as the Bulk Modulus (B).
The Master Equation
Bulk Modulus
To understand how much the cube shrinks, we rely on the definition of Bulk Modulus. It is defined as the ratio of volumetric stress (the change in pressure, Δp) to the volumetric strain (the fractional change in volume, VΔV).
The negative sign is crucial here. It mathematically represents a physical reality: an increase in pressure results in a decrease in volume. By rearranging this formula, we can isolate the fractional change in volume:
Crunching the Numbers
Now, let's bring in the numbers provided in the problem. The applied pressure is 4 GPa, which we must convert to standard SI units: 4×109 Pa. The Bulk Modulus is given as 8×1010 Pa.
We substitute these values into our rearranged equation and multiply by 100 to find the percentage change:
VΔV×100%=−8×10104×109×100%
The powers of ten cancel out beautifully, leaving us with:
So, the overall volume of the cube decreases by exactly 5%.
From Volume to Length
The Geometric Link
But the question doesn't ask for the change in volume; it asks for the percentage change in the side length of the cube. How do we bridge this gap?
We know that for a cube, the volume V is the cube of its side length l:
For very small fractional changes (typically less than 5%), we can use the rules of error analysis or logarithmic differentiation. Taking the natural logarithm of both sides and differentiating yields:
This tells us that the fractional change in volume is three times the fractional change in length. Rearranging this to solve for the length change gives:
The Final Verdict
Finally, we substitute our previously calculated percentage change in volume (−5%) into this new relation:
The side length of the cube decreases by approximately 1.67%. This elegant interplay between macroscopic geometry and material elasticity leads us directly to the correct answer.