Animated Solution for Physics - Rotational Motion: Two thin circular discs of mass m and 4m, having radii of a and 2a, respectively, are rigidly fixed by a massless, rigid rod of length l=24a through their centers. This assembly is laid on a firm and flat surface and set rolling without slipping on the surface so that the angular speed about the axis of the rod is ω. The angular momentum of the entire assembly about the point 'O' is L (see the figure). Which of the following statement(s) is (are) true?
Select Answer:
* Multiple Correct
Visualized Solution
Geometry of the Assembly
The rod connects the origin O to the centers of the two discs.
Let θ be the angle the rod makes with the horizontal.
From the geometry of the smaller disc, tanθ=la=24aa=241.
This gives sinθ=51 and cosθ=524.
Kinematics of the Center of Mass
The velocity of the center of the smaller disc P is v=aω.
The angular velocity of the rod about an axis perpendicular to it is ω′=lv=laω.
The angular velocity of the CM about the Z-axis is the vertical component of ω′.
ωCM−z=ω′cosθ=laω524=24ω524=5ω.
This confirms option (c) is correct.
Spin Angular Momentum
The angular momentum of the assembly about its center of mass is due to its spin ω along the rod.
LD−CM=ICMω=(21ma2+21(4m)(2a)2)ω.
LD−CM=(21ma2+8ma2)ω=217ma2ω.
This confirms option (d) is correct.
Orbital Angular Momentum
The distance of the CM from O is rCM=5mm(l)+4m(2l)=59l.
The angular momentum of the CM about O is LCM−O=MrCM2ω′.
LCM−O=(5m)(59l)2(laω)=581mlaω.
Substituting l=24a, LCM−O=58124ma2ω.
This shows option (b) is incorrect.
Total Angular Momentum Projection
The z-component of the total angular momentum is Lz=LCM−Ocosθ−LD−CMsinθ.
Lz=(58124ma2ω)524−(217ma2ω)241.
Lz=2581×24ma2ω−22417ma2ω=55ma2ω.
This shows option (a) is incorrect.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Dynamics of Rigid Body Rotation
Solution Diagram
This problem is a beautiful, albeit notoriously tricky, exploration of 3D rigid body dynamics. It tests your ability to decouple complex rotational motion into its fundamental components: spin and orbital precession.
Analyzing the Setup
Imagine the assembly rolling on the floor. The rod acts as the generator of a cone, with its apex at the origin O. Because the discs are rigidly fixed to the rod, their planes are perpendicular to it. For the discs to touch the floor, the vertical drop from their centers to the floor must equal the height of their centers above the floor.
Mathematically, if the rod makes an angle θ with the horizontal, the height of the smaller disc's center is lsinθ. The vertical drop to the point of contact is acosθ. Equating these gives us the crucial geometric constraint: tanθ=la. Given l=24a, we find tanθ=241, which elegantly yields sinθ=51 and cosθ=524.
The Master Equation for Kinematics
As the assembly rolls, it spins about the rod with angular velocity ω. This spin causes the center of the smaller disc to move with a linear velocity v=aω. However, this entire assembly is also sweeping out a cone, meaning the rod itself is rotating about an axis perpendicular to it with an angular velocity ω′=lv=laω.
The angular velocity of the center of mass about the vertical Z-axis is simply the vertical projection of this orbital rotation. Thus, ωCM−z=ω′cosθ. Substituting our values, we get ωCM−z=laω524=5ω. This confirms that option (c) is perfectly correct.
Decoupling the Angular Momentum
Angular momentum in 3D is a beast best tamed by splitting it into two parts: the spin angular momentum about the center of mass, and the orbital angular momentum of the center of mass about the origin.
The spin angular momentum is straightforward. It's the moment of inertia of the discs about the rod multiplied by the spin ω.
LD−CM=(21ma2+21(4m)(2a)2)ω=217ma2ω
This confirms option (d).
For the orbital part, we first locate the center of mass at a distance rCM=59l from O. The orbital angular momentum is LCM−O=MrCM2ω′. Plugging in the numbers gives LCM−O=58124ma2ω. This is close to, but not exactly, 81ma2ω, making option (b) incorrect.
Final Calculation
To find the total z-component of the angular momentum, we must project both the orbital and spin vectors onto the Z-axis. The orbital vector points upwards and slightly inwards, while the spin vector points downwards along the rod.
Lz=LCM−Ocosθ−LD−CMsinθ
Substituting all our hard-earned values into this equation yields a result of approximately 76.06ma2ω, which is nowhere near the 55ma2ω claimed in option (a). Thus, only options (c) and (d) stand true in this magnificent dance of physics.