Introduction to Orbital Dynamics
Imagine standing on a planet, looking up at the night sky, and watching two artificial satellites trace elegant, concentric paths across the heavens.
This problem invites us to step into the shoes of an astronaut aboard one of these satellites, S1, and observe the motion of a neighboring satellite, S2, at their moment of closest approach.
To solve this, we must bridge the gap between absolute orbital motion governed by gravity and the relative kinematics experienced by observers in non-inertial frames.
---
Analyzing the Setup with Kepler's Laws
We are given two satellites revolving in coplanar circular orbits in the same sense (direction) around a central planet.
Their time periods of revolution are:
We are also given that the radius of the orbit of S1 is:
To find the radius of the second satellite's orbit, r2, we invoke Kepler's Third Law of Planetary Motion, which states that the square of the orbital period is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis (or radius for circular orbits):
Using this proportionality, we can set up a ratio between the two orbits:
Substituting the known values:
r2=104×(18)2/3=104×(23)2/3=4×104 km
This tells us that the second satellite orbits at exactly four times the distance of the first satellite from the planet's center.
---
Finding the Absolute Orbital Speeds
Now that we have the orbital radii for both satellites, we can compute their absolute speeds.
For a circular orbit, the speed is simply the circumference of the orbit divided by the time period of revolution:
Let's calculate this for both satellites:
For S1:
v1=1 h2π×104 km=2π×104 km/h
For S2:
v2=8 h2π×(4×104 km)=π×104 km/h
Notice that even though S2 has a larger orbit, its speed is exactly half of S1's speed. This is a fundamental characteristic of gravitational orbits: the further out you are, the slower you travel.
---
Part (a)
Relative Velocity at Closest Approach
At the moment of closest approach, the two satellites, S1 and S2, and the center of the planet lie on a single straight line.
Because they are moving in the same sense, their velocity vectors are parallel and point in the same direction.
Therefore, the velocity of S2 relative to S1 is given by the simple vector difference:
vrel=π×104−2π×104=−π×104 km/h
The negative sign indicates that to an astronaut on S1, the outer satellite S2 appears to be drifting backward at a speed of π×104 km/h.
---
Part (b)
Relative Angular Velocity
Now, let's look at the angular speed of S2 as observed by an astronaut in S1.
By definition, the relative angular velocity ωrel of one object with respect to another is the component of their relative velocity perpendicular to the line joining them, divided by the distance between them:
At the moment of closest approach, the line joining the two satellites is radial.
Since both velocity vectors are tangential, the relative velocity vector is already perpendicular to the line joining them.
Thus, the perpendicular component of relative velocity is simply the magnitude of the relative velocity:
vrel,⊥=∣v2−v1∣=π×104 km/h
The distance between the two satellites at closest approach is:
rrel=r2−r1=4×104−104=3×104 km
Now, we substitute these values into our angular velocity formula. To get the answer in standard SI units (radians per second), we must convert kilometers to meters and hours to seconds:
vrel,⊥=π×104 km/h=π×104×3600 s1000 m=π×104×185 m/s
Now, compute ωrel:
ωrel=3×107π×104×185=54×1035π rad/s
ωrel≈5400015.708≈2.91×10−4 rad/s≈3.0×10−4 rad/s
This extremely small angular speed reflects the vast distances involved in space travel, showing how slowly objects appear to rotate across the cosmic background even when traveling at thousands of kilometers per hour.