The Magic of Phase Space
Imagine you are trying to describe the complete state of a moving particle.
Just knowing its position is not enough; you also need to know how fast it is moving, and in what direction.
In classical mechanics, we capture this complete state by plotting the particle's momentum (p) against its position (x) on a two-dimensional graph.
This abstract space is called Phase Space, and the path the particle traces in this space is its phase space trajectory.
For a simple harmonic oscillator, the position and momentum are out of phase by 90∘.
Mathematically, we write:
If we square both terms and eliminate time t, we get the equation of an ellipse:
This is a beautiful result! It tells us that the phase space trajectory of any simple harmonic oscillator is always an ellipse.
Let's see how we can use this geometric insight to solve our problem.
Analyzing the Two Oscillators
Let's look at the two plots given in the problem.
For the first oscillator, the trajectory is an ellipse with semi-major axis a along the x-axis and semi-minor axis b along the p-axis.
Comparing this with our standard ellipse equation, we can immediately identify:
Amplitude (A1) =a
Maximum Momentum (p1,max) =b
Since maximum momentum is defined as pmax=mωA, we can write:
And the total energy E1 is simply the maximum kinetic energy:
Now, let's look at the second oscillator. Its trajectory is a circle of radius R.
A circle is just a special case of an ellipse where both axes are equal! Therefore:
Amplitude (A2) =R
Maximum Momentum (p2,max) =R
Using the same logic, we find its angular frequency ω2:
And its total energy E2 is:
Connecting the Scales
The problem provides two scaling relationships to connect these two systems:
Equating these two expressions for a gives:
This is our master key! We can now express all our physical quantities in terms of just b, m, and n.
Let's rewrite ω1 using this relation:
Verifying the Options
Now, let's test each option one by one with our simplified expressions.
# Option (b)
Ratio of Angular Frequencies
Let's calculate the ratio ω1ω2:
This matches Option (b) perfectly! Therefore, Option (b) is correct.
# Option (c)
Product of Angular Frequencies
Let's calculate the product ω1ω2:
ω1ω2=mn21⋅m1=m2n21eqn2
Thus, Option (c) is incorrect.
# Option (d)
Ratio of Energy to Frequency
Let's calculate the ratio ωE for both oscillators.
For Oscillator 1:
ω1E1=1/(mn2)b2/(2m)=2b2n2
For Oscillator 2:
Since R=bn, we have R2=b2n2. Substituting this into the expression for Oscillator 2:
They are exactly equal! Therefore, Option (d) is correct.
# Option (a)
Product of Energy and Frequency
Let's calculate the product Eω for both oscillators:
E1ω1=2mb2⋅mn21=2m2n2b2
E2ω2=2mR2⋅m1=2m2R2=2m2b2n2
These are clearly not equal unless n=1. Thus, Option (a) is incorrect.
A Deeper Physical Insight
Adiabatic Invariance
Why did the ratio ωE turn out to be so beautifully symmetric?
In physics, the area enclosed by a phase space trajectory is given by:
Area=π×semi-major axis×semi-minor axis
For our first oscillator, this area is:
Area1=πab=πA1(mω1A1)=2π(ω121mω12A12)=2πω1E1
This ratio, J=ωE, is known as the Action Variable.
In classical mechanics, if you slowly (adiabatically) change the parameters of an oscillator (like slowly shortening the string of a pendulum), the energy E and frequency ω will both change, but their ratio ωE will remain absolutely constant!
This is known as an adiabatic invariant, and it laid the foundation for the old quantum theory, where Bohr quantized this very action variable in units of Planck's constant h.
So, by solving this JEE Advanced problem, you have actually touched upon one of the deepest bridges connecting classical mechanics to quantum physics!