The Setup
A Tale of Two Beakers
Imagine you are in a laboratory. On the bench in front of you sit two identical beakers, labeled A and B. Both are filled with the exact same volume of liquid, and both have been heated to a precise 60∘C.
You step back and watch them cool. But here is the catch: the liquids inside are fundamentally different. Liquid A is slightly lighter, with a density of 8×102 kg/m3, and has a specific heat capacity of 2000 J kg−1K−1. Liquid B is denser at 103 kg/m3 and has a much higher specific heat capacity of 4000 J kg−1K−1.
The question asks us to predict their future. If we were to plot their temperatures over time, what would the graphs look like? Which one wins the race to room temperature?
The Master Equation
Newton's Law of Cooling
To solve this, we need a mathematical tool that governs how things cool down. Enter Newton's Law of Cooling. This law states that the rate at which an object loses heat is directly proportional to the temperature difference between the object and its surroundings.
Mathematically, the rate of heat loss is given by:
dtdQ=hA(T−T0)
Here, h is the heat transfer coefficient (which depends on the emissivity and the surrounding medium), A is the exposed surface area, T is the temperature of the liquid, and T0 is the ambient room temperature.
But we don't just want the rate of
heat loss; we want the rate of
temperature drop. We know from calorimetry that heat relates to temperature through mass and specific heat:
dQ=−msdT
Substituting this into our cooling equation gives:
−msdtdT=hA(T−T0)
Rearranging for the rate of cooling, we get:
dtdT=−mshA(T−T0)
Unpacking the Mass
Density and Volume
The problem doesn't give us the mass m directly. Instead, it gives us the volume V and the density ρ. We know that mass is simply density times volume (m=ρV). Let's substitute this into our master equation:
Now, let's look at the constants. Both beakers are identical, so they have the same surface area A and the same volume V. The problem explicitly states they have the same emissivity, meaning h is the same. They are in the same room, so T0 is the same. And they both start at 60∘C.
This means that the entire expression VhA(T−T0) is a constant for both beakers at any given temperature! The only variables that differ between beaker A and beaker B are the density ρ and the specific heat s.
Therefore, the magnitude of the rate of cooling is inversely proportional to the product of density and specific heat:
This product, ρs, is known as the volumetric heat capacity. It represents the "thermal inertia" of the liquid per unit volume. A higher volumetric heat capacity means the liquid is more stubborn—it holds onto its temperature more tightly.
The Final Calculation
Who Cools Faster?
Let's calculate this thermal inertia for both liquids.
For Liquid A:
ρAsA=(8×102 kg/m3)×(2000 J kg−1K−1)
ρAsA=16×105 J/m3K
For Liquid B:
ρBsB=(103 kg/m3)×(4000 J kg−1K−1)
ρBsB=40×105 J/m3K
Comparing the two, it is glaringly obvious that ρAsA<ρBsB.
Because the rate of cooling is
inversely proportional to this product, the smaller thermal inertia of Liquid A means it has a
higher rate of cooling.
Liquid A is losing its temperature faster than Liquid B.
Visualizing the Race
If Liquid A cools faster, its temperature at any time t>0 will be lower than Liquid B's temperature. On a graph of Temperature (T) versus time (t), the curve for A must plunge downward more steeply and lie below the curve for B.
Furthermore, look at the differential equation: dtdT∝−(T−T0). The rate of change of temperature depends on the temperature itself. This is the classic signature of an exponential decay, not a linear relationship. The graphs must be curves that asymptotically approach room temperature, not straight lines.
Looking at the options, we need the one where both graphs are exponential curves, and curve A is below curve B. This perfectly matches the schematic shown in option (b).
And there you have it! By breaking down the physics of heat transfer and understanding the concept of volumetric heat capacity, we've successfully predicted the thermal destiny of our two beakers.