The Elegance of the Complementary Path
Imagine you are standing before a vast collection of 50 numbered tiles, ranging from 1 to 50. You are tasked with picking two distinct tiles. The challenge is to find the probability that their product is divisible by 3.
At first glance, you might feel the urge to start listing pairs—(3,1),(3,2),(6,1),(6,2)… but stop. In the world of JEE Advanced, brute force is rarely the path to victory. Instead, let us look for the 'hidden geometry' of the problem.
The Power of the Complement
When a problem asks for the probability of an event occurring, we often find ourselves staring at a mountain of possibilities. But what if we looked at the valley instead?
The complement of our event—the scenario where the product ab is NOT divisible by 3—is much easier to visualize. If the product of two numbers is not divisible by 3, then neither a nor b can contain a factor of 3.
Because 3 is prime, if it does not divide a and it does not divide b, it cannot possibly divide their product. This is the fundamental beauty of prime numbers.
Mapping the Territory
First, let us define our universe. We have 50 numbers. The total number of ways to choose any two distinct numbers is given by the combination formula:
This is our denominator, the total number of possible outcomes. Now, let us identify the 'multiples of 3' within our set.
By calculating ⌊350⌋, we find there are 16 such numbers: {3,6,9,…,48}. Conversely, the numbers that are NOT multiples of 3 are 50−16=34.
The Execution
If we want the product to NOT be divisible by 3, we must choose both of our numbers from the pool of 34 non-multiples. The number of ways to do this is:
(234)=2×134×33=17×33=561
So, the probability of the 'bad' event (the product not being divisible by 3) is simply the ratio of these favorable outcomes to the total:
The Final Victory
We are almost there. We know that the sum of the probability of an event and its complement must equal 1. Therefore, the probability that the product IS divisible by 3 is:
Performing the final subtraction, we arrive at:
P(E)=12251225−561=1225664
Look at that result. It is not just a fraction; it is the culmination of logical deduction. By choosing to count what we didn't want, we saved ourselves from a labyrinth of complex cases.
Remember, in physics and mathematics, the most elegant solution is often the one that simplifies the problem into its most basic, fundamental truths. You have mastered the logic—now carry this confidence into your next challenge!