Two boys are standing near the ends of a 100 m long conveyor belt that is running with a constant ve

Q: Why do we need to calculate ground velocities? Can't we just use their relative velocities?

The question specifically asks for the distance walked 'relative to the ground'. While relative velocities are great for finding meeting times, the actual distance covered depends on their speed in the ground frame.

Q: Why doesn't Boy B wait for Boy A at the end of the belt?

The problem states they 'continue the process repeatedly' after returning towards the ends. This implies continuous motion. If B waited, his average speed would drop, and the beautiful symmetry of the 75-second super-cycle would break.

Q: How did you know they would eventually sync up at 75 seconds?

By tracing their paths chronologically. When B turns around at 25s, A is still moving. This creates a 'chase' phase where their speeds are equal, keeping their separation constant. This delay perfectly offsets their initial time difference, causing them to sync up after the second meeting.

Q: Is the distance walked by A and B always equal in such problems?

Not necessarily! It's a special consequence of the specific numbers chosen here ($v_{belt} = 1$, $v_{walk} = 3$). The symmetry emerges because the time spent walking fast perfectly balances the time spent walking slow over the full super-cycle.

Q: Can I solve this using the center of mass frame?

It's tricky because the boys change directions at different times, meaning the velocity of their center of mass isn't constant. The position-time graph approach is much more robust and visually intuitive for tracking these discrete changes.

Question

Two boys are standing near the ends of a 100 m long conveyor belt that is running with a constant velocity 1.0 m/s. The boys step on the conveyer belt on its opposite ends and start walking towards each other. After meeting, they immediately return towards the ends of the belt and then continue the process repeatedly. The boys walk with a constant speed of 3 m/s relative to the conveyer belt. What distance relative to the ground do the boys walk in the first 300 s?

Sigma Percentile · Accepted Answer

The problem of two boys walking on a moving conveyor belt might seem like a standard relative velocity question at first glance. However, as we trace their steps, a beautiful, hidden symmetry emerges from seemingly chaotic, asymmetric motions. Let's break down this intricate dance step by step.

### Establishing the Ground Rules

The conveyor belt is $100 	ext{ m}$ long and moves with a constant velocity $v_c = 1 	ext{ m/s}$. Let's assume it moves to the right. The boys walk at a speed of $3 	ext{ m/s}$ relative to the belt.

To find the distance walked relative to the ground, we must first determine their ground velocities.

For Boy A (starting at the left end):
When he walks right, the belt assists him: $v_{A, 	ext{right}} = 3 + 1 = 4 	ext{ m/s}$.
When he walks left, he fights the belt: $v_{A, 	ext{left}} = |-3 + 1| = 2 	ext{ m/s}$.

For Boy B (starting at the right end):
When he walks left, he fights the belt: $v_{B, 	ext{left}} = |-3 + 1| = 2 	ext{ m/s}$.
When he walks right, the belt assists him: $v_{B, 	ext{right}} = 3 + 1 = 4 	ext{ m/s}$.

### The First Encounter

They start walking towards each other. Boy A moves at $4 	ext{ m/s}$ and Boy B moves at $2 	ext{ m/s}$. Their relative speed of approach is $4 - (-2) = 6 	ext{ m/s}$.

To cover the $100 	ext{ m}$ separation, they take $t_1 = \frac{100}{6} = \frac{50}{3} 	ext{ s}$.

Because Boy A is moving twice as fast as Boy B relative to the ground, they meet closer to B's end, exactly at $x_1 = 4 	imes \frac{50}{3} = \frac{200}{3} 	ext{ m}$.

### The Asymmetric Return

Immediately after meeting, they turn back. Now, Boy A must travel $\frac{200}{3} 	ext{ m}$ back to his starting point, but he is fighting the belt at $2 	ext{ m/s}$. It takes him $t_{A1} = \frac{200/3}{2} = \frac{100}{3} 	ext{ s}$. His total time since the start is $\frac{50}{3} + \frac{100}{3} = 50 	ext{ s}$.

Boy B, on the other hand, only has to travel $\frac{100}{3} 	ext{ m}$ back to his end, and he is assisted by the belt at $4 	ext{ m/s}$. It takes him a mere $t_{B1} = \frac{100/3}{4} = \frac{25}{3} 	ext{ s}$. His total time since the start is $\frac{50}{3} + \frac{25}{3} = 25 	ext{ s}$.

Here lies the crux of the problem: **They do not return to their starting points at the same time.**

### The Chase Phase

At $t = 25 	ext{ s}$, Boy B reaches his end and immediately turns around to continue the process. He starts walking left at $2 	ext{ m/s}$.

But wait! Boy A is still on his way back, also walking left at $2 	ext{ m/s}$.

Since their velocities are identical, Boy B cannot catch up to Boy A. The distance between them remains locked at $50 	ext{ m}$ for the next $25 	ext{ s}$, until Boy A finally reaches his end at $t = 50 	ext{ s}$.

### The Second Meeting and The Super-Cycle

At $t = 50 	ext{ s}$, Boy A reaches his end and turns around, charging right at $4 	ext{ m/s}$. Boy B is now exactly in the middle of the belt ($x = 50 	ext{ m}$), still walking left at $2 	ext{ m/s}$.

They close this $50 	ext{ m}$ gap at a relative speed of $6 	ext{ m/s}$, meeting for the second time after $\frac{50}{6} = \frac{25}{3} 	ext{ s}$. This happens at $t = 50 + \frac{25}{3} = \frac{175}{3} 	ext{ s}$.

They turn back once more. This time, the distances are reversed. Boy A has a shorter distance to return, and Boy B has a longer one. Miraculously, both take exactly $\frac{50}{3} 	ext{ s}$ to return.

At exactly $t = \frac{175}{3} + \frac{50}{3} = 75 	ext{ s}$, both boys arrive at their starting ends simultaneously! This $75 	ext{ s}$ interval forms a perfect, repeating **super-cycle**.

### The Final Tally

Let's calculate the ground distance covered by each boy in one $75 	ext{ s}$ super-cycle.

Boy A's distance: $4(\frac{50}{3}) + 2(\frac{100}{3}) + 4(\frac{25}{3}) + 2(\frac{50}{3}) = 200 	ext{ m}$.

Boy B's distance: $2(\frac{50}{3}) + 4(\frac{25}{3}) + 2(\frac{100}{3}) + 4(\frac{50}{3}) = 200 	ext{ m}$.

Despite their highly asymmetric paths, both boys walk exactly $200 	ext{ m}$ relative to the ground in one super-cycle.

The question asks for the distance covered in $300 	ext{ s}$. Since $300 	ext{ s}$ contains exactly $4$ complete super-cycles ($\frac{300}{75} = 4$), we simply multiply the distance by $4$.

Both boys walk a total distance of **$800 	ext{ m}$** relative to the ground. A beautifully symmetric result born from a complex, asymmetric journey!

Visualized Solution

Ground Velocities

First Meeting $M_{1}$

Return Journey 1

Chase Phase

Second Meeting $M_{2}$

Super Cycle Completes

Distance per Cycle

Total Distance

The Sigma Insight: Relative Velocity

Establishing the Ground Rules

The First Encounter

The Asymmetric Return

The Chase Phase

The Second Meeting and The Super-Cycle

The Final Tally

Similar Questions

A boy reaches the airport and finds that the escalator is not working. He walks up the stationary escalator in time $t_{1}$ . If he remains stationary on a moving escalator, then the escalator takes him up in time $t_{2}$ . The time taken by him to walk up on the moving escalator will be

A boy crosses a river twice on a straight path at an angle $ϕ = 3 0^{\circ}$ with the downstream direction, first time in two minutes and second time in four minutes. If his speed relative to river current is $v_{b / w} = 3 m/s$ in both the attempts, find speed of the river current.