Animated Solution for Physics - Waves: A tuning fork A of unknown frequency produces 5 beats/s with a fork of known frequency 340 Hz. When fork A is filled, the beat frequency decreases to 2 beats/s. What is the frequency of fork A?
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Visualizing the Frequencies
fB=340 Hz
Beat Frequency Formula
fbeat=∣fA−fB∣
fbeat=5 Hz
Possible Frequencies of A
∣fA−340∣=5
fA=340±5
fA=345 Hzor335 Hz
Effect of Filing
Filing⟹Mass decreases
Frequency (f)∝Mass1
∴fA increases
Testing fA=345 Hz
If fA=345 Hz, then fA′>345 Hz
New beats =fA′−340>5 Hz
But given new beats =2 Hz
∴fA=345 Hz
Testing fA=335 Hz
If fA=335 Hz, then fA′>335 Hz
If fA′=338 Hz
New beats =340−338=2 Hz
This matches the given condition!
Final Conclusion
Original frequency of fork A =335 Hz
The Way Forward
What if wax was added to fork A?
Adding wax ⟹Mass increases
⟹Frequency decreases
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Interference of Waves
Solution Diagram
Imagine you are a detective, and your job is to find the exact frequency of a mysterious tuning fork. You are given a few clues: a known tuning fork, an initial beat frequency, and a physical modification made to the unknown fork. Let's break down this classic physics mystery step by step!
The Setup
Our Anchor Point
We start by visualizing the frequencies on a number line. We have a known tuning fork, let's call it Fork B, with a frequency of exactly 340 Hz. This is our anchor point.
The problem tells us that our unknown Fork A produces 5 beats/s with Fork B. We know that the beat frequency is simply the absolute difference between the frequencies of the two tuning forks:
fbeat=∣fA−fB∣
The Two Suspects
Since the beat frequency is 5 Hz, our unknown Fork A could either be 5 Hz above or 5 Hz below Fork B.
fA=340±5
This gives us two possible suspects for the frequency of Fork A: it is either sitting at 345 Hz or 335 Hz. To find out which one is the true frequency, we need to look at the next clue.
The Clue
Filing the Fork
The problem states that Fork A is "filled". In the context of physics problems, this is almost always a typographical error for filed. When you file a tuning fork, you scrape off some of the metal from its prongs.
Think of a tuning fork like a mass on a spring. The frequency of oscillation is inversely proportional to the square root of the mass (f∝m1). By filing the fork, we decrease its mass, which causes it to vibrate faster. Therefore, filing a tuning fork always increases its frequency. On our number line, this means the frequency of Fork A will shift to the right.
Testing the Suspects
Let's test our first suspect, 345 Hz. If we file it, its frequency increases, moving further to the right (e.g., to 347 Hz or 348 Hz). The gap between it and our anchor at 340 Hz will now be strictly greater than 5 Hz. But the question says the new beat frequency decreases to 2 Hz! So, 345 Hz is definitely not our answer.
Now let's look at the second suspect, 335 Hz. If we file this one, its frequency increases, moving it to the right and closer to 340 Hz. The gap shrinks! If the new frequency reaches 338 Hz, the new beat frequency would be exactly:
340−338=2 Hz
This perfectly matches our given condition.
The Verdict
By eliminating the impossible, we can confidently conclude that the original frequency of tuning fork A must have been 335 Hz.
As a mental exercise, think about what would happen if the problem said we added wax to the tuning fork instead of filing it. Adding wax increases mass and decreases frequency, which would completely flip our number line analysis!