Introduction to 2D Standing Waves
Imagine a tightly stretched drumhead or a metal plate clamped firmly at its edges.
When you strike it, waves travel outward, reflect off the boundaries, and interfere with one another.
Under specific conditions, this interference produces standing waves, where certain points remain completely stationary while others vibrate with maximum amplitude.
This problem asks us to find the mathematically valid expressions for the transverse displacement u(x,y) of a square plate clamped at all its four edges.
Let's dive into the physics of boundaries and discover how physical constraints dictate mathematical equations.
---
The Power of Boundary Conditions
In physics, the behavior of a system at its limits is governed by boundary conditions.
For a square plate clamped at its edges, the physical constraint is simple: the edges are held completely rigid and cannot move.
Mathematically, this means the displacement u(x,y) must be exactly zero at all points along the boundaries.
Let's define the boundaries of our square plate of side length L:
1. The bottom edge OA lies along the line y=0 for 0≤x≤L.
2. The right edge AB lies along the line x=L for 0≤y≤L.
3. The top edge BC lies along the line y=L for 0≤x≤L.
4. The left edge OC lies along the line x=0 for 0≤y≤L.
Therefore, any valid standing wave expression u(x,y) must satisfy the following four conditions simultaneously:
u(0,y)=0andu(L,y)=0for all y∈[0,L]
u(x,0)=0andu(x,L)=0for all x∈[0,L]
These boundary conditions act as a filter, immediately eliminating any mathematical functions that do not vanish at these boundaries.
---
Testing the Candidates
Let's systematically test each option against our boundary conditions.
# Testing Option (a)
The first candidate is:
u(x,y)=acos(2Lπx)cos(2Lπy)
Let's check the boundary x=0:
u(0,y)=acos(0)cos(2Lπy)=acos(2Lπy)
Since cos(2Lπy) is not zero for all y∈[0,L], this option violates the boundary condition u(0,y)=0.
Thus, option (a) is incorrect.
---
# Testing Option (b)
The second candidate is:
u(x,y)=asin(Lπx)sin(Lπy)
Let's check the x-boundaries:
- At x=0: u(0,y)=asin(0)sin(Lπy)=0 (Satisfied)
- At x=L: u(L,y)=asin(π)sin(Lπy)=0 (Satisfied)
Now, let's check the y-boundaries:
- At y=0: u(x,0)=asin(Lπx)sin(0)=0 (Satisfied)
- At y=L: u(x,L)=asin(Lπx)sin(π)=0 (Satisfied)
Since all four boundary conditions are perfectly satisfied, option (b) is a possible expression.
---
# Testing Option (c)
The third candidate is:
u(x,y)=asin(Lπx)sin(L2πy)
Let's check the x-boundaries:
- At x=0: u(0,y)=asin(0)sin(L2πy)=0 (Satisfied)
- At x=L: u(L,y)=asin(π)sin(L2πy)=0 (Satisfied)
Now, let's check the y-boundaries:
- At y=0: u(x,0)=asin(Lπx)sin(0)=0 (Satisfied)
- At y=L: u(x,L)=asin(Lπx)sin(2π)=0 (Satisfied)
Since all boundary conditions are satisfied, option (c) is also a possible expression.
---
# Testing Option (d)
The final candidate is:
u(x,y)=acos(L2πx)sin(Lπy)
Let's check the boundary x=0:
u(0,y)=acos(0)sin(Lπy)=asin(Lπy)
This is not zero for all y∈[0,L], violating the boundary condition u(0,y)=0.
Thus, option (d) is incorrect.
---
Conclusion
Only options (b) and (c) satisfy all the boundary conditions of the clamped square plate.
This elegant result shows how physical constraints act as mathematical filters, allowing only specific harmonic modes to exist on the plate.