The Landscape of Piecewise Functions
Imagine you are standing on a vast, rugged terrain. This terrain isn't a single, smooth hill; it is a landscape composed of three distinct, connected sections.
This is exactly what a piecewise function like f(x) represents. To find the local minima, we aren't just solving an equation; we are exploring this terrain to find the lowest valleys.
Phase 1
The Linear Descent (x<−1)
In the first region, where x<−1, the function is defined as f(x)=1−2x. This is a simple, straight path with a constant negative slope of −2.
As you walk along this path, you are constantly descending. There is no valley here, just a continuous slide downward. Since the function is strictly decreasing, we can confidently say there are no local minima in this region.
Phase 2
The Modulus Valley (x=0)
Now, we enter the second region, defined for −1≤x≤2 as:
This is where the terrain gets interesting. The modulus function ∣x∣ acts like a mirror, reflecting the path. We must split this at x=0.
For −1≤x<0, the function is f(x)=31(7−2x), which continues our descent. But at x=0, the path hits a sharp turn.
For 0≤x≤2, the function becomes f(x)=31(7+2x), and suddenly, the slope becomes positive. We have found our first valley.
By substituting x=0 into the function, we find the first local minimum value:
Phase 3
The Jump Discontinuity (x=2)
As we approach x=2, we encounter a cliff. If we look at the left-hand limit, f(2−)=311, but the right-hand limit, using the third definition, drops to:
f(2+)=181(2−4)(2−5)=181(−2)(−3)=186=31
This is a massive jump discontinuity. Because the value at x=2 is higher than the values immediately to its right, this point is a local maximum, not a minimum. We must be careful not to fall into this trap!
Phase 4
The Parabolic Vertex (x=4.5)
Finally, we reach the third region, where x>2. The function is f(x)=181(x−4)(x−5).
If we expand this, we get f(x)=181(x2−9x+20), which is an upward-opening parabola. Every parabola has a vertex—the absolute lowest point of that curve.
We find this vertex using the formula x=−2ab, which gives us x=29=4.5. This is well within our region x>2.
Let's calculate the value at this valley:
f(29)=181(29−4)(29−5)=181(21)(−21)=−721
This is our second local minimum!
The Final Summation
We have traversed the entire landscape and identified our two valleys. The first valley is at f(0)=37, and the second is at f(29)=−721.
The problem asks for the sum of all local minimum values. Let's combine them:
To add these, we need a common denominator, which is 72. Converting 37, we get 72168.
Now, 72168−721=72167. We have successfully navigated the terrain and found the sum of our local minima. The final result is 72167.