The Dance of Variables
A Statistical Journey
Welcome, future engineers! Today, we are going to dissect a problem that looks like a standard statistics question but is actually a beautiful exercise in algebraic symmetry and number theory. We are given a dataset: 3,7,12,a,43−a.
Our mission is to find how many natural numbers a exist such that the variance of this set is a natural number. Let's embark on this journey.
Phase 1
The Constant Anchor
When you first look at a dataset with a variable, your instinct might be to panic. But take a breath and look at the terms. We have a and 43−a.
If we calculate the mean, xˉ, we sum all observations and divide by n=5. Watch the magic happen:
Notice how the +a and −a cancel out perfectly? This is the universe telling you that the mean is independent of a.
We are left with 565, which gives us a clean, constant mean of xˉ=13. This is our anchor. No matter what a is, the data will always balance around 13.
Phase 2
The Variance Beast
Now, we invoke the variance formula: σ2=n∑xi2−(xˉ)2. We know n=5 and xˉ=13. The real work lies in calculating ∑xi2.
Let's expand this carefully:
∑xi2=32+72+122+a2+(43−a)2
Calculating the constants: 9+49+144=202. Now, expand (43−a)2 using the identity (x−y)2=x2−2xy+y2. This gives us 1849−86a+a2.
Combining everything, we get:
∑xi2=202+a2+1849−86a+a2=2a2−86a+2051
Now, substitute this back into our variance formula:
To combine these, we use a common denominator of 5. Since 169×5=845, we have:
σ2=52a2−86a+2051−845=52a2−86a+1206
Phase 3
The Modular Trap
We need σ2 to be a natural number. This means the numerator 2a2−86a+1206 must be divisible by 5. In the language of number theory, we write this as a congruence:
Let's simplify the coefficients modulo 5. Since 86=85+1, −86≡−1(mod5). And 1206=1205+1, so 1206≡1(mod5).
Our condition becomes:
Now, we test the possible remainders of a when divided by 5 (the set {0,1,2,3,4}):
1. If a≡0, then $2(0)^2 - 0 + 1 = 1
ot\equiv 0$.
2. If a≡1, then $2(1)^2 - 1 + 1 = 2
ot\equiv 0$.
3. If a≡2, then $2(4) - 2 + 1 = 7 \equiv 2
ot\equiv 0$.
4. If a≡3, then $2(9) - 3 + 1 = 18 - 3 + 1 = 16 \equiv 1
ot\equiv 0$.
5. If a≡4, then $2(16) - 4 + 1 = 32 - 4 + 1 = 29 \equiv 4
ot\equiv 0$.
Conclusion
After testing every possible case, we find that the expression 2a2−a+1 is never divisible by 5. It is a mathematical impossibility for the variance to be a natural number for any integer a.
Therefore, the number of such values is exactly 0.
This problem teaches us that even when the algebra looks daunting, structure and modular arithmetic can dismantle the complexity. Keep practicing, stay curious, and remember: the math always tells the truth!