The Geometry of the Void
Understanding 'No Real Roots'
Welcome, future engineer. Today, we are going to dissect a problem that seems like a simple algebraic exercise but is actually a beautiful study of the behavior of quadratic functions.
We are given the equation (1+m2)x2−2(1+3m)x+(1+8m)=0 and asked to find the number of integral values of m for which it has no real roots.
Imagine a parabola on a coordinate plane. If an equation has 'no real roots,' it means the parabola is floating—it never touches or crosses the x-axis.
Mathematically, this 'floating' state is governed by the discriminant, D=B2−4AC. If D<0, the parabola stays strictly above or below the axis, and the roots remain in the complex plane.
The Algebraic Setup
Let us identify our players. Comparing our equation to the standard form Ax2+Bx+C=0, we find:
A=(1+m2)
B=−2(1+3m)
C=(1+8m)
Now, we invoke the condition for no real roots: D<0. Substituting our coefficients, we get the inequality:
[−2(1+3m)]2−4(1+m2)(1+8m)<0
I know, it looks intimidating. But take a deep breath; in JEE Advanced, the complexity is often a mask for a simple, elegant simplification waiting to be discovered.
The Art of Simplification
Notice the factor of 4. We have a 4 coming from the square of the −2, and a 4 in the second term. Let us divide the entire inequality by 4 immediately.
We are left with:
Now, expand with precision. The first term becomes 1+6m+9m2. The second term, when multiplied out, yields 1+8m+m2+8m3.
Subtracting these, the constants cancel out beautifully, leaving us with:
The Final Twist
We are almost there. To make this easier to read, let us multiply by −1. Remember the golden rule: when you multiply an inequality by a negative number, the sign flips!
So, we obtain:
Now, factor out the common 2m:
Look closely at that quadratic inside the parenthesis. It is a perfect square: (2m−1)2. Thus, our inequality simplifies to:
The Conclusion
An Infinite Possibility
We need this product to be positive. Since (2m−1)2 is a square, it is always non-negative. It is zero only when m=21.
Since we need the product to be strictly greater than zero, we must exclude m=21. For all other values of m, (2m−1)2 is positive.
Therefore, the inequality reduces to 2m>0, which means m>0. We are looking for integral values of m such that m>0 and $m
eq \frac{1}{2}$.
The integers satisfying this are 1,2,3,4,… and so on. There is no upper bound! Thus, there are infinitely many integral values of m.