Welcome, warriors of mathematics! Today, we are going to dismantle a problem that, at first glance, looks like a brute-force nightmare.
Imagine you are staring at the inequality 11n>10n+9n for n ranging from 1 to 100. If you try to calculate these powers, you will be lost in a sea of digits before you even reach n=10.
But here is the secret: JEE Advanced problems are rarely about calculation; they are about pattern recognition. Let us embark on this journey of simplification.
The Symmetry of Numbers
Look at the bases: 11, 10, and 9. Do you see the hidden harmony? They are perfectly symmetric around 10.
We have 11=10+1 and 9=10−1. This is not a coincidence; it is an invitation to use the Binomial Theorem.
Let us rewrite our inequality by moving
9n to the left:
11n−9n>10n
Now, substitute our symmetric bases:
(10+1)n−(10−1)n>10n
Suddenly, the problem transforms from a daunting exponential inequality into a beautiful algebraic expansion.
The Binomial Magic
Now, let us invoke the Binomial Theorem. We know that:
(x+a)n=r=0∑nnCrxn−rar
When we expand (10+1)n and (10−1)n, something magical happens. For (10+1)n, all terms are positive. For (10−1)n, the terms alternate in sign.
When we subtract the second from the first, the even-positioned terms (where r is even) cancel out entirely! The odd-positioned terms (where r is odd) double up.
We are left with:
11n−9n=2[nC110n−1+nC310n−3+nC510n−5+…]
This is the heart of the problem. We have simplified the left-hand side into a sum of positive terms.
The Logic of Dominance
Let us look at the first term of this expansion: 2⋅nC1⋅10n−1. Since nC1=n, this term is simply 2n⋅10n−1.
Our inequality now looks like this:
2n⋅10n−1+Positive Terms>10n
If we can prove that the first term alone is greater than or equal to 10n, then the entire inequality must hold true because the remaining terms are all positive.
Dividing both sides by 10n−1, we get 2n≥10, which simplifies beautifully to n≥5.
The Verdict
This is the moment of truth. For any n≥5, the inequality is guaranteed to be true.
But what about the boundary? We must check n=4. Calculating directly: 114=14641, while 104+94=10000+6561=16561.
Clearly, 14641<16561, so n=4 fails. Since the gap only widens as n decreases, n=1,2,3 will also fail.
We have found our range:
n must be in the set
{5,6,7,…,100}. To find the count, we take the total of
100 numbers and subtract the
4 invalid cases:
100−4=96
There you have it! Through the power of binomial expansion and logical deduction, we have conquered the problem without ever needing a calculator. Keep this spirit of inquiry alive, and you will solve any problem that comes your way.