Animated Solution for Physics - Optics: Consider a tank made of glass (refractive index is 1.5) with a thick bottom. It is filled with a liquid of refractive index μ. A student finds that, irrespective of what the incident angle i (see figure) is for a beam of light entering the liquid, the light reflected from the liquid glass interface is never completely polarised. For this to happen, the minimum value of μ is
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Visualizing the Setup
The system consists of three media: Air (n=1), Liquid (refractive index μ), and Glass (n=1.5).
Tracing the Light Ray
A light ray enters from air at an angle of incidence i.
It refracts into the liquid at an angle r.
Reflection at the Bottom
The refracted ray strikes the liquid-glass interface.
By alternate interior angles, the angle of incidence here is also r.
Brewster's Law
According to Brewster's Law, reflected light is completely plane-polarised when the angle of incidence equals the Brewster angle, iB.
The Constraint
The problem states the light is never completely polarised.
This implies the angle of incidence r can never reach iB.
Maximum Angle of Refraction
The maximum possible value for r occurs when i=90∘ (grazing incidence).
This maximum angle is the critical angle, iC, for the air-liquid interface.
Setting up the Inequality
For r to never reach iB, the maximum value of r must be strictly less than iB.
iC<iB
⇒sin(iC)<sin(iB)
Calculating sin(iC)
Applying Snell's Law at the air-liquid interface for grazing incidence:
1⋅sin(90∘)=μ⋅sin(iC)
⇒sin(iC)=μ1
Calculating tan(iB)
Applying Brewster's Law at the liquid-glass interface:
tan(iB)=μliquidμglass=μ1.5
Converting tan(iB) to sin(iB)
From tan(iB)=μ1.5, we construct a right triangle.
Opposite =1.5, Adjacent =μ
Hypotenuse =1.52+μ2
⇒sin(iB)=1.52+μ21.5
Substituting into the Inequality
Substitute sin(iC) and sin(iB) into sin(iC)<sin(iB):
μ1<1.52+μ21.5
Solving the Inequality
Square both sides:
μ21<2.25+μ22.25
Cross-multiply:
2.25+μ2<2.25μ2
Final Algebraic Steps
Rearrange the terms:
2.25<1.25μ2
μ2>1.252.25=59
μ>53
Conclusion
For the reflected light to never be completely polarised, the minimum value of μ is 53.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Polarization
Solution Diagram
Unlocking the Secrets of Polarization and Refraction
Imagine you are looking at a glass tank filled with a mysterious liquid. The setup is simple: air on top, a liquid of unknown refractive index μ in the middle, and a thick glass bottom with a refractive index of 1.5. A beam of light enters the liquid from the air, bends, and then strikes the glass bottom, reflecting back up.
This problem presents a fascinating constraint: no matter what angle the light enters the liquid, the light reflected from the glass bottom is never completely polarized. Let's decode what this means physically and mathematically.
The Condition for Polarization
When light reflects off a boundary between two transparent media, it can become completely plane-polarized. However, this only happens at one specific angle of incidence, known as Brewster's angle (iB).
According to Brewster's Law, the tangent of this angle is equal to the ratio of the refractive indices of the two media. For our liquid-glass interface, this means:
tan(iB)=μliquidμglass=μ1.5
If the light ray inside the liquid strikes the glass at exactly this angle iB, the reflected ray will be perfectly polarized.
The Constraint
Why it Never Polarizes
The problem states that complete polarization never happens. This implies a physical impossibility: the light ray traveling through the liquid can never reach an angle steep enough to equal Brewster's angle.
Let's trace the light's journey. It enters from air (a rarer medium) into the liquid (a denser medium). It refracts at an angle r. By simple geometry, this angle r is also the angle of incidence when the ray hits the glass bottom.
For the light to never polarize, the maximum possible value of r must be strictly less than iB. But what is the maximum value of r? It occurs when the light enters the liquid at a grazing angle (an incident angle of 90∘ in air). This maximum angle of refraction is exactly the critical angle (iC) for the air-liquid interface.
Therefore, our master constraint is:
iC<iB
Mathematical Formulation
Since the sine function is strictly increasing in the first quadrant, we can rewrite our constraint as:
sin(iC)<sin(iB)
Let's find expressions for both sides. First, applying Snell's Law at the air-liquid interface for grazing incidence (i=90∘):
1⋅sin(90∘)=μ⋅sin(iC)
sin(iC)=μ1
Next, we need sin(iB). We already know tan(iB)=μ1.5. Imagine a right-angled triangle where the opposite side is 1.5 and the adjacent side is μ. The hypotenuse is 1.52+μ2. Therefore:
sin(iB)=1.52+μ21.5
The Final Calculation
Now, we substitute these into our inequality:
μ1<1.52+μ21.5
To solve this, we square both sides to eliminate the square root:
μ21<2.25+μ22.25
Cross-multiplying gives us a simple algebraic inequality:
2.25+μ2<2.25μ2
Rearranging the terms to isolate μ:
2.25<1.25μ2
μ2>1.252.25=59
Taking the square root of both sides, we arrive at our final answer:
μ>53
Thus, for the reflected light to never be completely polarized, the refractive index of the liquid must be strictly greater than 53. The minimum bounding value is exactly 53.