The Dance of the Couples
A Combinatorial Journey
Welcome, future engineers! Today, we are not just solving a math problem; we are choreographing a badminton tournament. Imagine standing on the sidelines of a mixed doubles tournament where a very specific, mischievous rule is in place: no couple can play in the same match.
This isn't just a rule; it is a beautiful combinatorial constraint that will guide our entire journey.
Phase 1
Visualizing the Constraint
Let us define our universe. We have n couples, which means we have 2n people in total. A mixed doubles match requires 4 people: 2 men and 2 women.
The constraint is absolute: no couple can play in the same match. This means if a husband is on the court, his wife cannot be his partner, nor can she be his opponent.
Physically, this implies that the 4 players on the court must be drawn from 4 completely different couples. If we were to pick players from only 3 couples, at least one couple would be represented by two people, violating our rule. This realization is our first victory.
Phase 2
The Selection Dance
Now, let us build our match. First, we choose 2 men from our n couples. The number of ways to do this is simply (2n). Let us call these men M1 and M2, hailing from couples C1 and C2.
Next, we need 2 women. Because of the 'no couple' rule, the wives of M1 and M2 are strictly forbidden from this match. We must exclude couples C1 and C2 from our selection pool.
This leaves us with n−2 couples. From these remaining couples, we select our 2 women. The number of ways to do this is (2n−2).
Phase 3
The Arrangement Factor
We have our 4 players: M1,M2,W3,W4. Are we done? Not quite. We have the players, but we need to form the teams.
For any fixed set of 4 players, there are 2 distinct ways to pair them up:
1. (M1,W3) vs (M2,W4)
2. (M1,W4) vs (M2,W3)
This factor of 2 is crucial. It represents the internal arrangements of the match. Without it, we would be undercounting the total number of possible matches.
Phase 4
The Algebraic Climax
Now, we combine our logic into one elegant equation. The total number of matches is the product of our selections and our arrangements:
Let us expand these combinations. Recall that (2n)=2n(n−1). Our equation becomes:
2n(n−1)×2(n−2)(n−3)×2=840
Watch the magic happen. One of the 2s in the denominator cancels out with the 2 in the numerator. We are left with:
Cross-multiplying by 2, we get:
Here is where many students panic and try to expand this into a quartic equation. Do not do that! We are looking for the product of 4 consecutive integers that equals 1680.
Factoring 1680, we find:
Comparing n(n−1)(n−2)(n−3) with 8×7×6×5, we immediately see that n=8.
The Final Celebration
We have found n=8, which is the number of couples. The question asks for the total number of persons.
Since each couple has 2 people, the total number of participants is:
We have navigated the constraints, performed the selections, accounted for the arrangements, and solved the algebra with elegance. This is the essence of JEE mathematics—not just calculation, but the art of logical storytelling. Well done!