The Setup
Visualizing the Saturated Solution
Imagine a beaker containing a saturated solution of chromium(III) hydroxide, Cr(OH)3. At equilibrium, the solid precipitate at the bottom is in a dynamic balance with its dissolved ions in the water.
When one molecule of Cr(OH)3 dissolves, it breaks apart to yield one chromium ion, Cr3+, and three hydroxide ions, OH−. This stoichiometric ratio is the heartbeat of the entire problem. If we define the molar solubility of the salt as S, then the equilibrium concentrations of the ions will be:
The Master Equation
Solubility Product Constant
The solubility product constant, Ksp, is the ultimate mathematical tool for sparingly soluble salts. It is defined as the product of the equilibrium ion concentrations, with each concentration raised to the power of its stoichiometric coefficient from the balanced equation.
For our salt, the expression is:
The Trap
Stoichiometry in Concentration and Power
Here lies the most notorious trap in ionic equilibrium! Students often substitute 3S for the hydroxide concentration but forget to cube it, or they cube it but forget the 3 inside. You must do both. The concentration itself is physically three times the solubility, and the law of mass action dictates that this entire concentration must be cubed.
Let's substitute our values carefully:
Expanding the cube, we get 33=27 and S3. Multiplying by the initial S gives us:
The Algebraic Elegance
Simplifying the Expression
We are given that Ksp=6.0×10−31. Equating this to our derived expression, we can isolate S:
But wait! The question doesn't ask for the solubility S; it asks for the concentration of hydroxide ions, [OH−]. Remember our initial setup? The hydroxide concentration is 3S.
The Final Calculation
To match the options provided in the exam, we need to perform a neat algebraic trick. We can bring the coefficient 3 inside the fourth root by raising it to the power of 4. Since 34=81, the expression becomes:
[OH−]=(2781×6.0×10−31)1/4
Now, the math becomes beautifully simple. Dividing 81 by 27 gives exactly 3.
Multiplying 3 by 6.0 yields 18. Thus, our final, elegant answer is:
This perfectly matches option (b). Always trust the algebra, and never rush the final simplification steps!