The Tug-of-War Inside the Atom
Imagine an atom as a microscopic game of tug-of-war. On one side, you have the positively charged protons sitting in the nucleus, pulling inward. On the other side, you have the negatively charged electrons orbiting in the electron cloud, trying to spread out due to their mutual repulsion. The final size of the atom or ion is simply the equilibrium point of this intense battle.
When we look at the species Cl−, Ar, and Ca2+, we are looking at a very special scenario. Let's count their electrons. A neutral Chlorine atom has 17 electrons, but the Cl− ion has gained one, giving it 18. Argon is a noble gas that naturally possesses 18 electrons. Calcium normally has 20 electrons, but the Ca2+ ion has lost two, leaving it with exactly 18 electrons.
Because they all have exactly 18 electrons, we call them isoelectronic species (from the Greek iso meaning 'equal').
The Deciding Factor
Nuclear Charge
Since all three species have the exact same number of electrons arranged in the exact same energy levels (up to the n=3 shell), the outward push—the electron-electron repulsion—is practically identical for all of them.
So, if the outward push is a tie, what decides the winner of the tug-of-war? The inward pull!
This inward pull is determined by the nuclear charge, which is simply the number of protons in the nucleus (the atomic number, Z). Let's look at the nuclei of our three contenders:
Cl− has 17 protons.
Ar has 18 protons.
* Ca2+ has 20 protons.
The Golden Rule of Isoelectronic Size
Even though Ca2+ has the same number of electrons as the others, its nucleus is armed with 20 protons. This massive positive charge exerts a tremendous electrostatic pull on the 18 electrons, dragging the entire electron cloud closer to the center. Consequently, Ca2+ shrinks and becomes the smallest of the three.
On the other end of the spectrum, Cl− only has 17 protons trying to hold onto those same 18 electrons. The inward pull is much weaker, allowing the electron cloud to expand outward, making Cl− the largest.
Mathematically, for isoelectronic species, the ionic radius (r) is inversely proportional to the atomic number (Z):
Therefore, the size of isoelectronic species is entirely dictated by the nuclear charge. The greater the nuclear charge, the smaller the ionic radius. This makes option (d) the perfect answer.